Volume 15, Issue 5
Main Paper

Bayesian predictive power: choice of prior and some recommendations for its use as probability of success in drug development

Kaspar Rufibach

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: kaspar.rufibach@roche.com

Department of Biostatistics, Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland

Correspondence to: Kaspar Rufibach, Department of Biostatistics, Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.

E‐mail: kaspar.rufibach@roche.com

Search for more papers by this author
Hans Ulrich Burger

Department of Biostatistics, Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Markus Abt

Department of Biostatistics, Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 July 2016
Citations: 5

Abstract

Bayesian predictive power, the expectation of the power function with respect to a prior distribution for the true underlying effect size, is routinely used in drug development to quantify the probability of success of a clinical trial. Choosing the prior is crucial for the properties and interpretability of Bayesian predictive power. We review recommendations on the choice of prior for Bayesian predictive power and explore its features as a function of the prior. The density of power values induced by a given prior is derived analytically and its shape characterized. We find that for a typical clinical trial scenario, this density has a u‐shape very similar, but not equal, to a β‐distribution. Alternative priors are discussed, and practical recommendations to assess the sensitivity of Bayesian predictive power to its input parameters are provided. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 5

  • Decision‐making in drug development using a composite definition of success, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1870, 17, 5, (555-569), (2018).
  • Sample size re-estimation in a superiority clinical trial using a hybrid classical and Bayesian procedure, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1177/0962280218776991, (096228021877699), (2018).
  • Probability of success for phase III after exploratory biomarker analysis in phase II, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1804, 16, 3, (178-191), (2017).
  • Sample size determination for a binary response in a superiority clinical trial using a hybrid classical and Bayesian procedure, Trials, 10.1186/s13063-017-1791-0, 18, 1, (2017).
  • Utilizing Bayesian predictive power in clinical trial design, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.2073, 0, 0, (undefined).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.