Model averaging for treatment effect estimation in subgroups
Abstract
In many clinical trials, biological, pharmacological, or clinical information is used to define candidate subgroups of patients that might have a differential treatment effect. Once the trial results are available, interest will focus on subgroups with an increased treatment effect. Estimating a treatment effect for these groups, together with an adequate uncertainty statement is challenging, owing to the resulting “random high” / selection bias. In this paper, we will investigate Bayesian model averaging to address this problem. The general motivation for the use of model averaging is to realize that subgroup selection can be viewed as model selection, so that methods to deal with model selection uncertainty, such as model averaging, can be used also in this setting. Simulations are used to evaluate the performance of the proposed approach. We illustrate it on an example early‐phase clinical trial.
Citing Literature
Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 15
- Oliver N. Keene, Daniel J. Bratton, Subgroup Analysis: A View from Industry, Design and Analysis of Subgroups with Biopharmaceutical Applications, 10.1007/978-3-030-40105-4_15, (309-330), (2020).
- Alex Dmitrienko, Ilya Lipkovich, Aaron Dane, Christoph Muysers, Data-Driven and Confirmatory Subgroup Analysis in Clinical Trials, Design and Analysis of Subgroups with Biopharmaceutical Applications, 10.1007/978-3-030-40105-4_3, (33-91), (2020).
- Petra L. Graham, John L. Moran, ECMO, ARDS and meta-analyses: Bayes to the rescue?, Journal of Critical Care, 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.05.009, (2020).
- Nicolás M. Ballarini, Yi‐Da Chiu, Franz König, Martin Posch, Thomas Jaki, A critical review of graphics for subgroup analyses in clinical trials, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.2012, 19, 5, (541-560), (2020).
- Xinzhou Guo, Xuming He, Inference on Selected Subgroups in Clinical Trials, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 10.1080/01621459.2020.1740096, (1-18), (2020).
- Marius Thomas, Björn Bornkamp, Martin Posch, Franz König, A multiple comparison procedure for dose‐finding trials with subpopulations, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.201800111, 62, 1, (53-68), (2019).
- Heiko Götte, Marietta Kirchner, Meinhard Kieser, Adjustment for exploratory cut‐off selection in randomized clinical trials with survival endpoint, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.201800302, 62, 3, (627-642), (2019).
- Heinz Schmidli, Bayesian Reduced Rank Regression for Classification, Applications in Statistical Computing, 10.1007/978-3-030-25147-5_2, (19-30), (2019).
- Gerd Rosenkranz, Bibliography, Exploratory Subgroup Analyses in Clinical Research, 10.1002/9781119536734, (197-215), (2019).
- Francesco De Pretis, Barbara Osimani, New Insights in Computational Methods for Pharmacovigilance: E-Synthesis, a Bayesian Framework for Causal Assessment, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10.3390/ijerph16122221, 16, 12, (2221), (2019).
- Christian Röver, Simon Wandel, Tim Friede, Model averaging for robust extrapolation in evidence synthesis, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7991, 38, 4, (674-694), (2018).
- Jonathan P. Jarow, Personalized reproductive medicine: regulatory considerations, Fertility and Sterility, 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.027, 109, 6, (964-967), (2018).
- Nicolás M. Ballarini, Gerd K. Rosenkranz, Thomas Jaki, Franz König, Martin Posch, Subgroup identification in clinical trials via the predicted individual treatment effect, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0205971, 13, 10, (e0205971), (2018).
- Ilya Lipkovich, Alex Dmitrienko, Christoph Muysers, Bohdana Ratitch, Multiplicity issues in exploratory subgroup analysis, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2017.1397009, (1-19), (2017).
- Marius Thomas, Björn Bornkamp, Comparing Approaches to Treatment Effect Estimation for Subgroups in Clinical Trials, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 10.1080/19466315.2016.1251490, 9, 2, (160-171), (2016).




