Volume 27, Issue 4
Research Article

Assessing non‐inferiority of a new treatment in a three‐arm trial in the presence of heteroscedasticity

Mario Hasler

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: hasler@biostat.uni‐hannover.de

Institute of Biostatistics, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany

Institute of Biostatistics, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Herrenhäuser Strasse 2, D‐30419 Hannover, GermanySearch for more papers by this author
Richardus Vonk

Non‐Clinical Statistics, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Ludwig A. Hothorn

Institute of Biostatistics, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 September 2007
Citations: 33

Abstract

In this paper, we describe an adjusted method to facilitate non‐inferiority tests in a three‐arm design. While the methodology is readily available in the situation of homogeneous group variances, the adjusted method will also maintain the α‐level in the presence of heteroscedasticity. We propose explicit criteria for an optimal allocation. Depending on the pattern of heterogeneity, remarkably unbalanced designs are power optimal. We will apply the method to a randomized clinical trial and a toxicological experiment. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 33

  • Simultaneous confidence interval for assessing non‐inferiority with assay sensitivity in a three‐arm trial with binary endpoints, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.2010, 19, 5, (518-531), (2020).
  • Biostatistical Assessment of Mutagenicity Studies: A Stepwise Confidence Procedure, Journal of Probability and Statistics, 10.1155/2019/3249097, 2019, (1-8), (2019).
  • Sequential parallel comparison design for “gold standard” noninferiority trials with a prespecified margin, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.201800394, 61, 6, (1493-1506), (2019).
  • Non-inferiority test based on transformations for non-normal distributions, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 10.1016/j.csda.2016.10.004, 113, (73-87), (2017).
  • Blinded sample size re‐estimation in three‐arm trials with ‘gold standard’ design, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7356, 36, 23, (3636-3653), (2017).
  • Study duration for three-arm non-inferiority survival trials designed for accrual by cohorts, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1177/0962280216633908, 27, 2, (507-520), (2016).
  • A studentized permutation test for three‐arm trials in the ‘gold standard’ design, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7176, 36, 6, (883-898), (2016).
  • Group-sequential three-arm noninferiority clinical trial designs, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2016.1148710, 27, 1, (1-24), (2016).
  • Group-Sequential Three-Arm Non-inferiority Clinical Trials, Group-Sequential Clinical Trials with Multiple Co-Objectives, 10.1007/978-4-431-55900-9_6, (81-95), (2016).
  • Some practical considerations in three‐arm non‐inferiority trial design, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1779, 15, 6, (550-559), (2016).
  • A more efficient three-arm non-inferiority test based on pooled estimators of the homogeneous variance, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1177/0962280216681036, (096228021668103), (2016).
  • Noninferiority studies with multiple reference treatments, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1177/0962280215576017, 26, 3, (1295-1307), (2015).
  • Design and analysis of three‐arm trials with negative binomially distributed endpoints, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.6738, 35, 4, (505-521), (2015).
  • Social network targeting to maximise population behaviour change: a cluster randomised controlled trial, The Lancet, 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60095-2, 386, 9989, (145-153), (2015).
  • References, Statistics in Toxicology Using R, 10.1201/b19659-12, (209-232), (2015).
  • Heteroscedasticity: multiple degrees of freedom vs. sandwich estimation, Statistical Papers, 10.1007/s00362-014-0640-4, 57, 1, (55-68), (2014).
  • Noninferiority Studies with Multiple New Treatments and Heterogeneous Variances, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2014.920346, 25, 5, (958-971), (2014).
  • Testing non-inferiority of a new treatment in three-arm clinical trials with binary endpoints, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10.1186/1471-2288-14-134, 14, 1, (2014).
  • Design and semiparametric analysis of non‐inferiority trials with active and placebo control for censored time‐to‐event data, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.5769, 32, 18, (3055-3066), (2013).
  • Group sequential designs for three‐arm ‘gold standard’ non‐inferiority trials with fixed margin, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.5950, 32, 28, (4875-4889), (2013).
  • Three-Arm Noninferiority Trials with a Prespecified Margin for Inference of the Difference in the Proportions of Binary Endpoints, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2013.789893, 23, 4, (774-789), (2013).
  • Bayesian approach to non-inferiority trials for normal means, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1177/0962280212448723, 25, 1, (221-240), (2012).
  • A general approach for sample size calculation for the three‐arm ‘gold standard’ non‐inferiority design, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.5461, 31, 28, (3579-3596), (2012).
  • Multiple comparisons to both a negative and a positive control, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.503, 11, 1, (74-81), (2012).
  • Host-pathogen interactome mapping for HTLV-1 and -2 retroviruses, Retrovirology, 10.1186/1742-4690-9-26, 9, 1, (26), (2012).
  • Confidence in assessing the effectiveness of bath treatments for the control of sea lice on Norwegian salmon farms, Aquaculture, 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.03.029, 344-349, (58-65), (2012).
  • A generalized p -value approach for assessing noninferiority in a three-arm trial , Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1177/0962280210395739, 22, 3, (261-277), (2011).
  • Assessing noninferiority in a three‐arm trial using the Bayesian approach, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.4244, 30, 15, (1795-1808), (2011).
  • Testing Noninferiority Through Generalized p -values , Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 10.1198/sbr.2010.09028, 3, 1, (87-96), (2011).
  • Three-Arm Non-Inferiority Trials, Design and Analysis of Non-Inferiority Trials, 10.1201/b11039-7, (149-165), (2011).
  • On the three‐arm non‐inferiority trial including a placebo with a prespecified margin, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.4099, 30, 3, (224-231), (2010).
  • A ratio‐to‐control Williams‐type test for trend, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.464, 10, 4, (289-292), (2010).
  • Nonparametric non‐inferiority analyses in the three‐arm design with active control and placebo, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.3727, 28, 29, (3643-3656), (2009).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.