Volume 29, Issue 16
Research Article

A flexible unified approach to the analysis of pre‐clinical combination studies

Chris Harbron

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: Chris.Harbron@AstraZeneca.Com

Discovery Statistics, AstraZeneca R&D, Alderley Park, U.K.

Discovery Statistics, AstraZeneca R&D, Alderley Park, U.K.Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 June 2010
Citations: 15

Abstract

Combinations of drugs are increasingly being used in a variety of diseases. Pre‐clinical experiments allow the responses of many drug compounds to be studied in combination with the goal of identifying compounds acting synergistically. This paper presents a unified approach to analysing data from combination studies, calculating a hierarchy of interaction indices to powerfully and flexibly describe the synergistic profile of the combination space studied, utilizing standard statistical software to generate estimates of confidence and provide statistical tests. The approach can work with a wide variety of experimental designs and response patterns and will deal with partial responses and inactive compounds. As well as identifying synergy or antagonism, the same approach can also be used to identify a benefit or detriment to monotherapy. The approach is illustrated with data from an in vitro study. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 15

  • Bliss' and Loewe's additive and synergistic effects in Plasmodium falciparum growth inhibition by AMA1-RON2L, RH5, RIPR and CyRPA antibody combinations, Scientific Reports, 10.1038/s41598-020-67877-8, 10, 1, (2020).
  • P38 MAPK and glucocorticoid receptor crosstalk in bronchial epithelial cells, Journal of Molecular Medicine, 10.1007/s00109-020-01873-3, (2020).
  • -optimal designs for the two-variable binary logistic regression model with interaction , Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 10.1016/j.jspi.2017.08.007, 193, (136-150), (2018).
  • A Bayesian K‐PD model for synergy: A case study, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1887, 17, 6, (674-684), (2018).
  • Evaluation of Drug Combination Effect Using a Bliss Independence Dose–Response Surface Model, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 10.1080/19466315.2018.1437071, 10, 2, (112-122), (2018).
  • Pentoxifylline, dexamethasone and azithromycin demonstrate distinct age-dependent and synergistic inhibition of TLR- and inflammasome-mediated cytokine production in human newborn and adult blood in vitro, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0196352, 13, 5, (e0196352), (2018).
  • BIGL: Biochemically Intuitive Generalized Loewe null model for prediction of the expected combined effect compatible with partial agonism and antagonism, Scientific Reports, 10.1038/s41598-017-18068-5, 7, 1, (2017).
  • Monotonic single‐index models to assess drug interactions, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7158, 36, 4, (655-670), (2016).
  • Design and Evaluation of Drug Combination Studies, Nonclinical Statistics for Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Industries, 10.1007/978-3-319-23558-5_13, (349-363), (2016).
  • Experimental designs for detecting synergy and antagonism between two drugs in a pre‐clinical study, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1676, 14, 3, (216-225), (2015).
  • Synergistic interaction between cisplatin and PARP inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer, Cell Cycle, 10.4161/cc.24034, 12, 6, (877-883), (2014).
  • Erlotinib antagonizes ABC transporters in acute myeloid leukemia, Cell Cycle, 10.4161/cc.22382, 11, 21, (4079-4092), (2014).
  • Investigation of the robustness of two models for assessing synergy in pre‐clinical drug combination studies, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1583, 12, 5, (300-308), (2013).
  • A Two-Stage Response Surface Approach to Modeling Drug Interaction, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 10.1080/19466315.2012.707087, 4, 4, (375-383), (2012).
  • Synergistic Effects of p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Inhibition with a Corticosteroid in Alveolar Macrophages from Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 10.1124/jpet.111.180737, 338, 3, (732-740), (2011).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.