Volume 30, Issue 12
Research Article

Flexible modeling of the effects of continuous prognostic factors in relative survival

Amel Mahboubi

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1

Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1

Search for more papers by this author
Michal Abrahamowicz

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: michal.abrahamowicz@mcgill.ca

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1

Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1

Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University Health Centre, 687 Pine Ave. West, V‐Building, V2.20A, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1Search for more papers by this author
Roch Giorgi

LERTIM EA 3283, Faculté de Médecine, Université de la méditerranée, Marseille, F‐13005, France

Search for more papers by this author
Christine Binquet

INSERM, U866, Univ Bourgogne, Dijon, F‐21079, France

Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Dijon University Hospital, France

Search for more papers by this author
Claire Bonithon‐Kopp

INSERM, U866, Univ Bourgogne, Dijon, F‐21079, France

Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Dijon University Hospital, France

Search for more papers by this author
Catherine Quantin

INSERM, U866, Univ Bourgogne, Dijon, F‐21079, France

Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Dijon University Hospital, France

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 March 2011
Citations: 13

Abstract

Relative survival methods permit separating the effects of prognostic factors on disease‐related ‘excess mortality’ from their effects on other‐causes ‘natural mortality’, even when individual causes of death are unknown. As in conventional ‘crude’ survival, accurate assessment of prognostic factors requires testing and possibly modeling of non‐proportional effects and, for continuous covariates, of non‐linear relationships with the hazard. We propose a flexible extension of the additive‐hazards relative survival model, in which the observed all‐causes mortality hazard is represented by a sum of disease‐related ‘excess’ and natural mortality hazards. In our flexible model, the three functions representing (i) the baseline hazard for ‘excess’ mortality, (ii) the time‐dependent effects, and (iii) for continuous covariates, non‐linear effects, on the logarithm of this hazard, are all modeled by low‐dimension cubic regression splines. Non‐parametric likelihood ratio tests are proposed to test the time‐dependent and non‐linear effects. The accuracy of the estimated functions is evaluated in multivariable simulations. To illustrate the new insights offered by the proposed model, we apply it to re‐assess the effects of patient age and of secular trends on disease‐related mortality in colon cancer. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 13

  • Nonlinear and time‐dependent effects of sparsely measured continuous time‐varying covariates in time‐to‐event analysis, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.201900042, 62, 2, (492-515), (2020).
  • Comparison of Cox proportional hazards regression and generalized Cox regression models applied in dementia risk prediction, Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions, 10.1002/trc2.12041, 6, 1, (2020).
  • Prediction of cancer survival for cohorts of patients most recently diagnosed using multi-model inference, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1177/0962280220934501, 29, 12, (3605-3622), (2020).
  • On a general structure for hazard-based regression models: An application to population-based cancer research, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1177/0962280218782293, (096228021878229), (2018).
  • On comparison of net survival curves, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10.1186/s12874-017-0351-3, 17, 1, (2017).
  • Validation of the alternating conditional estimation algorithm for estimation of flexible extensions of Cox's proportional hazards model with nonlinear constraints on the parameters, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.201500035, 58, 6, (1445-1464), (2016).
  • Flexible estimation of survival curves conditional on non‐linear and time‐dependent predictor effects, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.6740, 35, 4, (553-565), (2015).
  • A reference relative time-scale as an alternative to chronological age for cohorts with long follow-up, Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, 10.1186/s12982-015-0043-6, 12, 1, (2015).
  • Flexible modeling of disease activity measures improved prognosis of disability progression in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.011, 68, 3, (307-316), (2015).
  • Multi-state relative survival modelling of colorectal cancer progression and mortality, Cancer Epidemiology, 10.1016/j.canep.2015.03.005, 39, 3, (447-455), (2015).
  • Impact of the model‐building strategy on inference about nonlinear and time‐dependent covariate effects in survival analysis, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.6178, 33, 19, (3318-3337), (2014).
  • A model combining excess and relative mortality for population‐based studies, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.5919, 33, 2, (275-288), (2013).
  • Description of an approach based on maximum likelihood to adjust an excess hazard model with a random effect, Cancer Epidemiology, 10.1016/j.canep.2013.04.001, 37, 4, (449-456), (2013).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.