Volume 32, Issue 16
Research Article

Group sequential enrichment design incorporating subgroup selection

Baldur P. Magnusson

Corresponding Author

Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

Correspondence to: Baldur P. Magnusson, Novartis Pharma AG, Postfach, CH‐4002 Basel, Switzerland.

E‐mail: baldur.magnusson@novartis.com

Search for more papers by this author
Bruce W. Turnbull

School of Operations Research and Information Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 13 January 2013
Citations: 37

Abstract

An important component of clinical trials in drug development is the analysis of treatment efficacy in patient subgroups (subpopulations). Because of concerns of multiplicity and of the small sample sizes often involved, such analyses can present substantial statistical challenges and may lead to misleading conclusions. As a confirmatory seamless phase II/III design, we propose an adaptive enrichment group sequential procedure whereby resources can be concentrated on subgroups most likely to respond to treatment. Stopping boundaries are defined through upper and lower spending functions. The procedure is presented in terms of the efficient score, enabling the analysis of normal, binary, or time‐to‐event data. It addresses the dilution effect by eliminating populations at the first stage that appear likely to derive no therapeutic benefit. It subsequently proceeds with the definitive assessment of treatment efficacy among the remaining pooled populations using a group sequential design. The procedure provides strong protection of familywise type I error rate, and we employ a bootstrap algorithm to obtain point and interval estimates that are adjusted for the selection bias. We give examples to demonstrate how the design is used. We make comparisons with adaptive two‐stage combination test procedures and with a group sequential test that does not account for the presence of subgroups. Numerical results show that the procedure has high power to detect subgroup‐specific effects and the use of multiple interim analysis points can lead to substantial sample size savings. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 37

  • Adaptive seamless clinical trials using early outcomes for treatment or subgroup selection: Methods, simulation model and their implementation in R, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.201900020, 62, 5, (1264-1283), (2020).
  • Bayesian methods for the analysis of early‐phase oncology basket trials with information borrowing across cancer types, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8675, 39, 25, (3459-3475), (2020).
  • Inference on Selected Subgroups in Clinical Trials, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 10.1080/01621459.2020.1740096, (1-18), (2020).
  • Adaptive group‐sequential design with population enrichment in phase 3 randomized controlled trials with two binary co‐primary endpoints, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8216, 38, 21, (3985-3996), (2019).
  • Statistical testing strategies for assessing treatment efficacy and marker accuracy in phase III trials, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1937, 18, 4, (459-475), (2019).
  • Subgroup analysis of treatment effects for misclassified biomarkers with time‐to‐event data, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 10.1111/rssc.12364, 68, 5, (1447-1463), (2019).
  • Multi‐stage enrichment and basket trial designs with population selection, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8371, 38, 29, (5470-5485), (2019).
  • Review of Statistical Methods for Biomarker-Driven Clinical Trials, JCO Precision Oncology, 10.1200/PO.18.00407, 3, (1-9), (2019).
  • Bayesian Approaches to Subgroup Analysis and Related Adaptive Clinical Trial Designs, JCO Precision Oncology, 10.1200/PO.19.00003, 3, (1-9), (2019).
  • Phase 3 Oncology Trials of Personalized Medicines with Adaptive Subpopulation Selection, Biopharmaceutical Applied Statistics Symposium, 10.1007/978-981-10-7820-0_3, (53-64), (2018).
  • Personalized Cancer Genomics, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 10.1146/annurev-statistics-031017-100609, 5, 1, (169-182), (2018).
  • Auxiliary variable–enriched biomarker‐stratified design, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7938, 37, 30, (4610-4635), (2018).
  • Design and estimation in clinical trials with subpopulation selection, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7925, 37, 29, (4335-4352), (2018).
  • Using Bayesian modeling in frequentist adaptive enrichment designs, Biostatistics, 10.1093/biostatistics/kxw054, 19, 1, (27-41), (2017).
  • Treatment evaluation for a data‐driven subgroup in adaptive enrichment designs of clinical trials, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7497, 37, 1, (1-11), (2017).
  • Inference for multimarker adaptive enrichment trials, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7422, 36, 26, (4083-4093), (2017).
  • Estimation of treatment effect in two‐stage confirmatory oncology trials of personalized medicines, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7272, 36, 12, (1843-1861), (2017).
  • Sensitivity of adaptive enrichment trial designs to accrual rates, time to outcome measurement, and prognostic variables, Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.08.003, 8, (39-48), (2017).
  • Clinical Trials in Precision Medicine, Progress and Challenges in Precision Medicine, 10.1016/B978-0-12-809411-2.00011-8, (209-215), (2017).
  • Bayesian, Utility-Based, Adaptive Enrichment Designs with Frequentist Error Control, Frontiers of Biostatistical Methods and Applications in Clinical Oncology, 10.1007/978-981-10-0126-0, (105-123), (2017).
  • Phase III Clinical Trial Designs Incorporating Predictive Biomarkers: An Overview, Frontiers of Biostatistical Methods and Applications in Clinical Oncology, 10.1007/978-981-10-0126-0, (85-103), (2017).
  • Population-Enrichment Adaptive Design Strategy for an Event-Driven Vaccine Efficacy Trial, Statistics in Biosciences, 10.1007/s12561-017-9202-3, (2017).
  • An adaptive design for updating the threshold value of a continuous biomarker, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7042, 35, 27, (4909-4923), (2016).
  • An optimal stratified Simon two‐stage design, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1742, 15, 4, (333-340), (2016).
  • Group sequential designs with prospectively planned rules for subpopulation enrichment, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.6957, 35, 21, (3776-3791), (2016).
  • Future Developments, Group-Sequential Clinical Trials with Multiple Co-Objectives, 10.1007/978-4-431-55900-9_7, (97-102), (2016).
  • Comparison of different clinical development plans for confirmatory subpopulation selection, Contemporary Clinical Trials, 10.1016/j.cct.2015.12.014, 47, (78-84), (2016).
  • Multiple testing procedures for adaptive enrichment designs: combining group sequential and reallocation approaches, Biostatistics, 10.1093/biostatistics/kxw014, 17, 4, (650-662), (2016).
  • Adaptive Informational Design of Confirmatory Phase III Trials With an Uncertain Biomarker Effect to Improve the Probability of Success, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 10.1080/19466315.2016.1173582, 8, 3, (237-247), (2016).
  • Statistical Design and Considerations of a Phase 3 Basket Trial for Simultaneous Investigation of Multiple Tumor Types in One Study, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 10.1080/19466315.2016.1193044, 8, 3, (248-257), (2016).
  • On Group Sequential Enrichment Design for Basket Trial, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 10.1080/19466315.2016.1200999, 8, 3, (293-306), (2016).
  • Adaptive Biomarker Population Selection in Phase III Confirmatory Trials with Time-to-Event Endpoints, Statistics in Biosciences, 10.1007/s12561-016-9178-4, (2016).
  • Methods for identification and confirmation of targeted subgroups in clinical trials: A systematic review, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2015.1092034, 26, 1, (99-119), (2015).
  • Adaptive enrichment designs: applications and challenges, Clinical Investigation, 10.4155/cli.15.9, 5, 4, (383-391), (2015).
  • A simple and flexible graphical approach for adaptive group-sequential clinical trials, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2014.972509, 26, 2, (202-216), (2014).
  • Adaptive designs for subpopulation analysis optimizing utility functions, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.201300257, 57, 1, (76-89), (2014).
  • Adaptive Designs for Confirmatory Clinical Trials with Subgroup Selection, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2013.857238, 24, 1, (168-187), (2014).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.