Volume 32, Issue 25
Research Article

Graphical tools for model selection in generalized linear models

K. Murray

Corresponding Author

School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Carslaw Building (F07), NSW 2006, Australia

Centre for Applied Statistics (M019), University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia

Correspondence to: K. Murray, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Carslaw Building (F07), NSW 2006, Australia.

E‐mail: kevin.murray@uwa.edu.au

Search for more papers by this author
S. Heritier

The George Institute for Global Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
S. Müller

School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Carslaw Building (F07), NSW 2006, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 May 2013
Citations: 6

Abstract

Model selection techniques have existed for many years; however, to date, simple, clear and effective methods of visualising the model building process are sparse. This article describes graphical methods that assist in the selection of models and comparison of many different selection criteria. Specifically, we describe for logistic regression, how to visualize measures of description loss and of model complexity to facilitate the model selection dilemma. We advocate the use of the bootstrap to assess the stability of selected models and to enhance our graphical tools. We demonstrate which variables are important using variable inclusion plots and show that these can be invaluable plots for the model building process. We show with two case studies how these proposed tools are useful to learn more about important variables in the data and how these tools can assist the understanding of the model building process. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 6

  • Fast and approximate exhaustive variable selection for generalised linear models with APES, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 10.1111/anzs.12276, 61, 4, (445-465), (2019).
  • Reducing Bruzzi’s Formula to Remove Instability in the Estimation of Population Attributable Fraction for Health Outcomes, American Journal of Epidemiology, 10.1093/aje/kwx200, (1-10), (2017).
  • Evaluation of diagnostics for hierarchical spatial statistical models, Geometry Driven Statistics, undefined, (239-259), (2015).
  • Can’t swallow, can’t transfer, can’t toilet: Factors predicting infections in the first week post stroke, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.05.035, 22, 1, (92-97), (2015).
  • FARMS: A New Algorithm for Variable Selection, BioMed Research International, 10.1155/2015/319797, 2015, (1-11), (2015).
  • Crohn's disease and smoking: Is it ever too late to quit?, Journal of Crohn's and Colitis, 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.05.007, 7, 12, (e665-e671), (2013).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.