Volume 35, Issue 4
Research Article

Design and analysis of three‐arm trials with negative binomially distributed endpoints

Tobias Mütze

GlaxoSmithKline, 7030 Kit Creek Road, Morrisville, NC 27560 U.S.A.

Institut für Medizinische Statistik, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Humboldtallee 32, Göttingen, 37073 Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Axel Munk

Institut für Mathematische Stochastik, Georg‐August‐Universität Göttingen, Goldschmitdstrasse 7, Göttingen, 37077 Germany

Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, Am Fassberg 11, Göttingen, 37077 Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Tim Friede

Corresponding Author

Institut für Medizinische Statistik, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Humboldtallee 32, Göttingen, 37073 Germany

Correspondence to: Tim Friede, Institut für Medizinische Statistik, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Humboldtallee 32, Göttingen, 37073, Germany.

E‐mail: tim.friede@med.uni‐goettingen.de

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 September 2015
Citations: 12

Abstract

A three‐arm clinical trial design with an experimental treatment, an active control, and a placebo control, commonly referred to as the gold standard design, enables testing of non‐inferiority or superiority of the experimental treatment compared with the active control. In this paper, we propose methods for designing and analyzing three‐arm trials with negative binomially distributed endpoints. In particular, we develop a Wald‐type test with a restricted maximum‐likelihood variance estimator for testing non‐inferiority or superiority. For this test, sample size and power formulas as well as optimal sample size allocations will be derived. The performance of the proposed test will be assessed in an extensive simulation study with regard to type I error rate, power, sample size, and sample size allocation. For the purpose of comparison, Wald‐type statistics with a sample variance estimator and an unrestricted maximum‐likelihood estimator are included in the simulation study. We found that the proposed Wald‐type test with a restricted variance estimator performed well across the considered scenarios and is therefore recommended for application in clinical trials. The methods proposed are motivated and illustrated by a recent clinical trial in multiple sclerosis. The R package ThreeArmedTrials, which implements the methods discussed in this paper, is available on CRAN. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 12

  • Simultaneous confidence interval for assessing non‐inferiority with assay sensitivity in a three‐arm trial with binary endpoints, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.2010, 19, 5, (518-531), (2020).
  • New approaches for testing non-inferiority for three-arm trials with Poisson distributed outcomes, Biostatistics, 10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa014, (2020).
  • Sample Size Calculation for “Gold-Standard” Noninferiority Trials With Fixed Margins and Negative Binomial Endpoints, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 10.1080/19466315.2020.1766551, (1-13), (2020).
  • Sequential parallel comparison design for “gold standard” noninferiority trials with a prespecified margin, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.201800394, 61, 6, (1493-1506), (2019).
  • Effects of three home-based exercise programmes regarding falls, quality of life and exercise-adherence in older adults at risk of falling: protocol for a randomized controlled trial, BMC Geriatrics, 10.1186/s12877-018-1021-y, 19, 1, (2019).
  • Sample size re‐estimation for clinical trials with longitudinal negative binomial counts including time trends, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8061, 38, 9, (1503-1528), (2018).
  • Non-inferiority testing for risk ratio, odds ratio and number needed to treat in three-arm trial, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 10.1016/j.csda.2018.08.018, (2018).
  • Design and analysis of a 3‐arm noninferiority trial with a prespecified margin for the hazard ratio, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1875, 17, 5, (489-503), (2018).
  • Group sequential designs for negative binomial outcomes, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1177/0962280218773115, (096228021877311), (2018).
  • Non-inferiority test based on transformations for non-normal distributions, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 10.1016/j.csda.2016.10.004, 113, (73-87), (2017).
  • Blinded sample size re‐estimation in three‐arm trials with ‘gold standard’ design, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7356, 36, 23, (3636-3653), (2017).
  • A studentized permutation test for three‐arm trials in the ‘gold standard’ design, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7176, 36, 6, (883-898), (2016).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.