Volume 36, Issue 4
Research Article

Designing therapeutic cancer vaccine trials with delayed treatment effect

Zhenzhen Xu

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: Zhenzhen.Xu@fda.hhs.gov

CBER, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 20993 U.S.A.

Correspondence to: Zhenzhen Xu, CBER, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, U.S.A.

E‐mail: Zhenzhen.Xu@fda.hhs.gov

Search for more papers by this author
Boguang Zhen

CBER, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 20993 U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Yongsoek Park

Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260 U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Bin Zhu

DCEG, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892 U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 November 2016
Citations: 22

Abstract

Arming the immune system against cancer has emerged as a powerful tool in oncology during recent years. Instead of poisoning a tumor or destroying it with radiation, therapeutic cancer vaccine, a type of cancer immunotherapy, unleashes the immune system to combat cancer. This indirect mechanism‐of‐action of vaccines poses the possibility of a delayed onset of clinical effect, which results in a delayed separation of survival curves between the experimental and control groups in therapeutic cancer vaccine trials with time‐to‐event endpoints. This violates the proportional hazard assumption. As a result, the conventional study design based on the regular log‐rank test ignoring the delayed effect would lead to a loss of power. In this paper, we propose two innovative approaches for sample size and power calculation using the piecewise weighted log‐rank test to properly and efficiently incorporate the delayed effect into the study design. Both theoretical derivations and empirical studies demonstrate that the proposed methods, accounting for the delayed effect, can reduce sample size dramatically while achieving the target power relative to a standard practice. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 22

  • Study design of single‐arm phase II immunotherapy trials with long‐term survivors and random delayed treatment effect, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1976, 19, 4, (358-369), (2020).
  • Treating non-responders: pitfalls and implications for cancer immunotherapy trial design, Journal of Hematology & Oncology, 10.1186/s13045-020-0847-x, 13, 1, (2020).
  • Quantifying treatment differences in confirmatory trials under non-proportional hazards, Journal of Applied Statistics, 10.1080/02664763.2020.1815673, (1), (2020).
  • Designing cancer immunotherapy trials with delayed treatment effect using maximin efficiency robust statistics, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.2003, 19, 4, (424-435), (2020).
  • Statistical and practical considerations in designing of immuno-oncology trials, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2020.1815035, (1-17), (2020).
  • Assessing Treatment Benefit in Immuno-oncology, Statistics in Biosciences, 10.1007/s12561-020-09268-1, (2020).
  • Is the Log-Rank and Hazard Ratio Test/Estimation the Best Approach for Primary Analysis for All Trials?, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 10.1200/JCO.19.03097, (JCO.19.03097), (2020).
  • Cancer immunotherapy trial design with delayed treatment effect, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1982, 19, 3, (202-213), (2019).
  • Cancer immunotherapy trial design with cure rate and delayed treatment effect, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8440, 39, 6, (698-708), (2019).
  • Modestly weighted logrank tests, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8186, 38, 20, (3782-3790), (2019).
  • Obstacles in the Development of Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines, Vaccines for Cancer Immunotherapy, 10.1016/B978-0-12-814039-0.00012-6, (153-160), (2019).
  • At the end of the beginning: immunotherapies as living drugs, Nature Immunology, 10.1038/s41590-019-0452-8, (2019).
  • Z max test for delayed effect in immuno-oncology clinical trials , Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2019.1632873, (1-23), (2019).
  • A robust approach to sample size calculation in cancer immunotherapy trials with delayed treatment effect, Biometrics, 10.1111/biom.12916, 74, 4, (1292-1300), (2018).
  • Designing cancer immunotherapy trials with random treatment time‐lag effect, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7937, 37, 30, (4589-4609), (2018).
  • Weighted log‐rank test for time‐to‐event data in immunotherapy trials with random delayed treatment effect and cure rate, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1878, 17, 5, (541-554), (2018).
  • Quantification of Long-term Survival Benefit in a Comparative Oncology Clinical Study, JAMA Oncology, 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0518, 4, 6, (881), (2018).
  • Interim Futility Monitoring Assessing Immune Therapies With a Potentially Delayed Treatment Effect, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.7144, 36, 23, (2444-2449), (2018).
  • Estimation of delay time in survival data with delayed treatment effect, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2018.1534857, (1-15), (2018).
  • Estimation of treatment effects in weighted log-rank tests, Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.09.004, 8, (147-155), (2017).
  • Design for immuno‐oncology clinical trials enrolling both responders and nonresponders, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8694, 0, 0, (undefined).
  • Sample size calculation for logrank test and prediction of number of events over time, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.2069, 0, 0, (undefined).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.