Volume 36, Issue 9
Research Article

Patient subgroup identification for clinical drug development

Xin Huang

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: xin.huang@abbvie.com

AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, U.S.A.

Correspondence to: Xin Huang, AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL U.S.A.

E‐mail: xin.huang@abbvie.com

Search for more papers by this author
Yan Sun

AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Paul Trow

AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Saptarshi Chatterjee

AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Arunava Chakravartty

AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, U.S.A.

Novartis Oncology, Hyderabad, India

Search for more papers by this author
Lu Tian

Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Viswanath Devanarayan

AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 February 2017
Citations: 14

Abstract

Causal mechanism of relationship between the clinical outcome (efficacy or safety endpoints) and putative biomarkers, clinical baseline, and related predictors is usually unknown and must be deduced empirically from experimental data. Such relationships enable the development of tailored therapeutics and implementation of a precision medicine strategy in clinical trials to help stratify patients in terms of disease progression, clinical response, treatment differentiation, and so on. These relationships often require complex modeling to develop the prognostic and predictive signatures. For the purpose of easier interpretation and implementation in clinical practice, defining a multivariate biomarker signature in terms of thresholds (cutoffs/cut points) on individual biomarkers is preferable. In this paper, we propose some methods for developing such signatures in the context of continuous, binary and time‐to‐event endpoints. Results from simulations and case study illustration are also provided. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 14

  • Exploratory Subgroup Identification for Biopharmaceutical Development, Design and Analysis of Subgroups with Biopharmaceutical Applications, 10.1007/978-3-030-40105-4_12, (245-270), (2020).
  • Data-Driven and Confirmatory Subgroup Analysis in Clinical Trials, Design and Analysis of Subgroups with Biopharmaceutical Applications, 10.1007/978-3-030-40105-4_3, (33-91), (2020).
  • Predictive Biomarker Identification for Biopharmaceutical Development, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 10.1080/19466315.2020.1819404, (1), (2020).
  • A new approach of subgroup identification for high-dimensional longitudinal data, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 10.1080/00949655.2020.1764555, (1-19), (2020).
  • A model‐based multithreshold method for subgroup identification, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8136, 38, 14, (2605-2631), (2019).
  • Subgroup identification via homogeneity pursuit for dense longitudinal/spatial data, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8192, 38, 17, (3256-3271), (2019).
  • Estimating individual treatment effects by gradient boosting trees, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8357, 38, 26, (5146-5159), (2019).
  • Subgroup identification for precision medicine: A comparative review of 13 methods, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10.1002/widm.1326, 9, 5, (2019).
  • Evaluating Potential Subpopulations Using Stochastic SIDEScreen in a Cross-Over Trial, Contemporary Biostatistics with Biopharmaceutical Applications, 10.1007/978-3-030-15310-6_17, (299-322), (2019).
  • VGF in Cerebrospinal Fluid Combined With Conventional Biomarkers Enhances Prediction of Conversion From MCI to AD, Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000328, 33, 4, (307-314), (2019).
  • Identification of a Simple and Novel Cut-Point Based Cerebrospinal Fluid and MRI Signature for Predicting Alzheimer’s Disease Progression that Reinforces the 2018 NIA-AA Research Framework, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 10.3233/JAD-180905, (1-14), (2019).
  • Response to Letter to the Editor, Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.08.018, 12, 11, (e192), (2017).
  • Promising efficacy and acceptable safety of venetoclax plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory MM, Blood, 10.1182/blood-2017-06-788323, 130, 22, (2392-2400), (2017).
  • Efficacy of venetoclax as targeted therapy for relapsed/refractory t(11;14) multiple myeloma, Blood, 10.1182/blood-2017-06-788786, 130, 22, (2401-2409), (2017).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.