Weighted win loss approach for analyzing prioritized outcomes‡
Abstract
To analyze prioritized outcomes, Buyse (2010) and Pocock et al. (2012) proposed the win loss approach. In this paper, we first study the relationship between the win loss approach and the traditional survival analysis on the time to the first event. We then propose the weighted win loss statistics to improve the efficiency of the unweighted methods. A closed‐form variance estimator of the weighted win loss statistics is derived to facilitate hypothesis testing and study design. We also calculated the contribution index to better interpret the results of the weighted win loss approach. Simulation studies and real data analysis demonstrated the characteristics of the proposed statistics. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Citing Literature
Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 16
- Samvel B Gasparyan, Folke Folkvaljon, Olof Bengtsson, Joan Buenconsejo, Gary G Koch, Adjusted win ratio with stratification: Calculation methods and interpretation, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1177/0962280220942558, (096228022094255), (2020).
- Gaohong Dong, Lu Mao, Bo Huang, Margaret Gamalo-Siebers, Jiuzhou Wang, GuangLei Yu, David C. Hoaglin, The inverse-probability-of-censoring weighting (IPCW) adjusted win ratio statistic: an unbiased estimator in the presence of independent censoring, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2020.1757692, (1-18), (2020).
- Lei Peng, The use of the win odds in the design of non-inferiority clinical trials, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2020.1757690, (1-6), (2020).
- Xiaodong Luo, Hui Quan, Some Meaningful Weighted Log-Rank and Weighted Win Loss Statistics, Statistics in Biosciences, 10.1007/s12561-020-09273-4, (2020).
- Lu Mao, Tuo Wang, A class of proportional win‐fractions regression models for composite outcomes, Biometrics, 10.1111/biom.13382, 0, 0, (2020).
- Gaohong Dong, Bo Huang, Yu‐Wei Chang, Yodit Seifu, James Song, David C. Hoaglin, The win ratio: Impact of censoring and follow‐up time and use with nonproportional hazards, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1977, 19, 3, (168-177), (2019).
- Charlie McLeod, Richard Norman, Edward Litton, Benjamin R. Saville, Steve Webb, Thomas L. Snelling, Choosing primary endpoints for clinical trials of health care interventions, Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100486, (100486), (2019).
- Gaohong Dong, David C. Hoaglin, Junshan Qiu, Roland A. Matsouaka, Yu-Wei Chang, Jiuzhou Wang, Marc Vandemeulebroecke, The win ratio: On interpretation and handling of ties, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 10.1080/19466315.2019.1575279, (1-14), (2019).
- Lu Mao, On the alternative hypotheses for the win ratio, Biometrics, 10.1111/biom.12954, 75, 1, (347-351), (2018).
- Xiaodong Luo, Hong Tian, Surya Mohanty, Wei Yann Tsai, Rejoinder to “on the alternative hypotheses for the win ratio”, Biometrics, 10.1111/biom.12953, 75, 1, (352-354), (2018).
- Dianne M. Finkelstein, David A. Schoenfeld, Graphing the Win Ratio and its components over time, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7895, 38, 1, (53-61), (2018).
- Nicholas A. Fergusson, Tim Ramsay, Michaël Chassé, Shane W. English, Greg A. Knoll, The win ratio approach did not alter study conclusions and may mitigate concerns regarding unequal composite end points in kidney transplant trials, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.02.001, 98, (9-15), (2018).
- Pamela A Shaw, Use of composite outcomes to assess risk–benefit in clinical trials, Clinical Trials, 10.1177/1740774518784010, 15, 4, (352-358), (2018).
- Roland A. Matsouaka, Aneesh B. Singhal, Rebecca A. Betensky, Optimal Weighted Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney Test for Prioritized Outcomes, New Frontiers of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, 10.1007/978-3-319-99389-8_1, (3-40), (2018).
- Gaohong Dong, Junshan Qiu, Duolao Wang, Marc Vandemeulebroecke, The stratified win ratio, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2017.1397007, (1-19), (2017).
- Marc Buyse, Generalized Pairwise Comparisons, Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online, 10.1002/9781118445112, (1-9), (2014).




