Volume 36, Issue 29
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Generalized survival models for correlated time‐to‐event data

Xing‐Rong Liu

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: xingrong.liu@ki.se

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, S‐171 77 Stockholm, Sweden

Correspondence

Xing‐Rong Liu, Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Box 281, S‐171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.

Email: xingrong.liu@ki.se

Search for more papers by this author
Yudi Pawitan

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, S‐171 77 Stockholm, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Mark S. Clements

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, S‐171 77 Stockholm, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 September 2017
Citations: 6

Abstract

Our aim is to develop a rich and coherent framework for modeling correlated time‐to‐event data, including (1) survival regression models with different links and (2) flexible modeling for time‐dependent and nonlinear effects with rich postestimation. We extend the class of generalized survival models, which expresses a transformed survival in terms of a linear predictor, by incorporating a shared frailty or random effects for correlated survival data. The proposed approach can include parametric or penalized smooth functions for time, time‐dependent effects, nonlinear effects, and their interactions. The maximum (penalized) marginal likelihood method is used to estimate the regression coefficients and the variance for the frailty or random effects. The optimal smoothing parameters for the penalized marginal likelihood estimation can be automatically selected by a likelihood‐based cross‐validation criterion. For models with normal random effects, Gauss‐Hermite quadrature can be used to obtain the cluster‐level marginal likelihoods. The Akaike Information Criterion can be used to compare models and select the link function. We have implemented these methods in the R package rstpm2. Simulating for both small and larger clusters, we find that this approach performs well. Through 2 applications, we demonstrate (1) a comparison of proportional hazards and proportional odds models with random effects for clustered survival data and (2) the estimation of time‐varying effects on the log‐time scale, age‐varying effects for a specific treatment, and two‐dimensional splines for time and age.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 6

  • Link-based survival additive models under mixed censoring to assess risks of hospital-acquired infections, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 10.1016/j.csda.2020.107092, 155, (107092), (2021).
  • Generalized parametric cure models for relative survival, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.201900056, 62, 4, (989-1011), (2020).
  • A risk score system based on DNA methylation levels and a�nomogram survival model for lung squamous cell carcinoma, International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 10.3892/ijmm.2020.4590, (2020).
  • Impact of model misspecification in shared frailty survival models, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8309, 38, 23, (4477-4502), (2019).
  • The frailty index is a predictor of cause-specific mortality independent of familial effects from midlife onwards: a large cohort study, BMC Medicine, 10.1186/s12916-019-1331-8, 17, 1, (2019).
  • Leukocyte Telomere Length and All-Cause Mortality: A Between-Within Twin Study With Time-Dependent Effects Using Generalized Survival Models, American Journal of Epidemiology, 10.1093/aje/kwy128, 187, 10, (2186-2191), (2018).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.