Volume 38, Issue 12
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Risk‐adjusted CUSUM charts under model error

Sven Knoth

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Philipp Wittenberg

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: pwitten@hsu-hh.de

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg, Germany

Philipp Wittenberg, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Helmut Schmidt University, 22043 Hamburg, Germany.

Email: pwitten@hsu-hh.de

Search for more papers by this author
Fah Fatt Gan

Department of Statistics and Applied Probability, National University of Singapore, Singapore

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 February 2019
Citations: 5

Abstract

In recent years, quality control charts have been increasingly applied in the healthcare environment, for example, to monitor surgical performance. Risk‐adjusted cumulative (CUSUM) charts that utilize risk scores like the Parsonnet score to estimate the probability of death of a patient from an operation turn out to be susceptible to misfitted risk models causing deterioration of the charts' properties, in particular, the false alarm behavior. Our approach considers the application of power transformations in the logistic regression model to improve the fit to the binary outcome data. We propose two different approaches of estimating the power exponent δ. The average run length (ARL) to false alarm is calculated with the popular Markov chain approximation in a more efficient way by utilizing the Toeplitz structure of the transition matrix. A sensitivity analysis of the in‐control ARL against the true value δ shows potential effects of incorrect choice of δ. Depending on the underlying patient mix, the results vary from robustness to severe impact (doubling of false alarm rate).

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 5

  • Statistical process monitoring to improve quality assurance of inpatient care, BMC Health Services Research, 10.1186/s12913-019-4866-7, 20, 1, (2020).
  • Improving the ARL profile and the accuracy of its calculation for Poisson EWMA charts, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 10.1002/qre.2606, 36, 3, (876-889), (2020).
  • Risk-adjusted frailty-based CUSUM control chart for phase I monitoring of patients’ lifetime, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 10.1080/00949655.2020.1814775, (1), (2020).
  • Monitoring of high-yield and periodical processes in health care, Health Care Management Science, 10.1007/s10729-020-09514-4, (2020).
  • Risk-Adjusted Control Charts: Theory, Methods, and Applications in Health, Statistics in Biosciences, 10.1007/s12561-019-09257-z, (2019).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.