The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Converging evidence that subliminal evaluative conditioning does not affect self‐esteem or cardiovascular activity

Anke Versluis

Corresponding Author

E-mail address:a.versluis@fsw.leidenuniv.nl

Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

CorrespondenceAnke Versluis, Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands.Email: E-mail address:a.versluis@fsw.leidenuniv.nl
Search for more papers by this author
Bart Verkuil

Clinical Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Jos F. Brosschot

Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 August 2017
Cited by: 1

Abstract

Self‐esteem moderates the relationship between stress and (cardiovascular) health, with low self‐esteem potentially exacerbating the impact of stressors. Boosting self‐esteem may therefore help to buffer against stress. Subliminal evaluative conditioning (SEC), which subliminally couples self‐words with positive words, has previously been successfully used to boost self‐esteem, but the existing studies are in need of replication. In this article, we aimed to replicate and extend previous SEC studies. The first 2 experiments simultaneously examined whether SEC increased self‐esteem (Experiment 1, n = 84) and reduced cardiovascular reactivity to a stressor in high worriers (Experiment 2, n = 77). On the basis of these results, the 3rd experiment was set up to examine whether an adjusted personalized SEC task increased self‐esteem and reduced cardiac activity in high worriers (n = 81). Across the 3 experiments, no effects were found of SEC on implicit or explicit self‐esteem or affect or on cardiovascular (re)activity compared to a control condition in which the self was coupled with neutral words. The results do not support the use of the subliminal intervention in its current format. As stress is highly prevalent, future studies should focus on developing other cost‐effective and evidence‐based interventions.

Number of times cited: 1

  • , Generalized Unsafety Theory of Stress: Unsafe Environments and Conditions, and the Default Stress Response, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10.3390/ijerph15030464, 15, 3, (464), (2018).