The legacy of climategate: revitalizing or undermining climate science and policy?
Abstract
The release of emails from a server at the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit (CRU) in November 2009 and the following climategate controversy have become a topic for interpretation in the social sciences. This article picks out some of the most visible social science comments on the affair for discussion. These comments are compared to an account of what can be seen as problematic practices by climate scientists. There is general agreement in these comments that climate science needs more openness and transparency. But when evaluating climategate a variety of responses is seen, ranging from the apologetic to the highly critical, even condemning the practices in question. It is argued that reluctance to critically examine the climategate affair, including suspect practices of scientists, has to do with the nature of the debate which is highly politicized. A call is made for more reflection on this case which should not be closed off because of political expediency. WIREs Clim Change 2012 doi: 10.1002/wcc.166
This article is categorized under:
- Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Knowledge and Practice
Number of times cited: 19
- Anna Leuschner, Is it appropriate to ‘target’ inappropriate dissent? on the normative consequences of climate skepticism, Synthese, 195, 3, (1255), (2018).
- Dror Etzion, Joel Gehman, Fabrizio Ferraro and Miron Avidan, Unleashing sustainability transformations through robust action, Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, (167), (2017).
- Diana Liverman, U.S. National climate assessment gaps and research needs: overview, the economy and the international context, Climatic Change, 135, 1, (173), (2016).
- , Drawing Boundaries: Boundary Arrangements of the IPCC Working Groups, Glocality, 2, 1, (2016).
- Warren Pearce, Brian Brown, Brigitte Nerlich and Nelya Koteyko, Communicating climate change: conduits, content, and consensus, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6, 6, (613-626), (2015).
- Stuart Capstick, Lorraine Whitmarsh, Wouter Poortinga, Nick Pidgeon and Paul Upham, International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6, 1, (35-61), (2014).
- Jon C. Lovett, Modelling the effects of climate change in Africa, African Journal of Ecology, 53, 1, (1-2), (2015).
- Iina Hellsten and Eleftheria Vasileiadou, The creation of the climategate hype in blogs and newspapers: mixed methods approach, Internet Research, 25, 4, (589), (2015).
- Meritxell Ramírez-i-Ollé, Rhetorical Strategies for Scientific Authority: A Boundary-Work Analysis of ‘Climategate’, Science as Culture, 24, 4, (384), (2015).
- Inmaculada de Melo-Martín and Kristen Intemann, Who's Afraid of Dissent? Addressing Concerns about Undermining Scientific Consensus in Public Policy Developments, Perspectives on Science, 22, 4, (593), (2014).
- Ferenc Jankó, Norbert Móricz and Judit Papp Vancsó, Reviewing the climate change reviewers: Exploring controversy through report references and citations, Geoforum, 56, (17), (2014).
- Neil Carter, The politics of climate change in the UK, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5, 3, (423-433), (2014).
- Rusi Jaspal, Brigitte Nerlich and Nelya Koteyko, Contesting Science by Appealing to Its Norms, Science Communication, 35, 3, (383), (2013).
- Myanna Lahsen, Climategate: the role of the social sciences, Climatic Change, 119, 3-4, (547), (2013).
- Ana Ivanova, Mike S. Schäfer, Inga Schlichting and Andreas Schmidt, Is There a Medialization of Climate Science? Results From a Survey of German Climate Scientists, Science Communication, 35, 5, (626), (2013).
- Brigitte Nerlich, Moderation impossible? On hype, honesty and trust in the context of modern academic life, The Sociological Review, 61, S2, (43-57), (2013).
- Mike S. Schäfer, Online communication on climate change and climate politics: a literature review, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3, 6, (527-543), (2012).
- Edward Maibach, Anthony Leiserowitz, Sara Cobb, Michael Shank, Kim M. Cobb and Jay Gulledge, The legacy of climategate: undermining or revitalizing climate science and policy?, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3, 3, (289-295), (2012).
- Lahsen Myanna, Climategate and the virtue of the scientific community: an editorial commentary on the Maibach et al. and Grundmann opinion articles, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3, 3, (279-280), (2012).
