Volume 19, Issue 5
Research Article

Statistical metrics for assessing the quality of wind power scenarios for stochastic unit commitment

Didem Sari

Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Youngrok Lee

Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sarah Ryan

Corresponding Author

Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA

Correspondence

Sarah Ryan, Iowa State University, 3004 Black Engineering Bldg., Ames, Iowa 50011‐2164, USA.

E‐mail: smryan@iastate.edu

Search for more papers by this author
David Woodruff

University of California Davis, Davis, California, 95616 USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 July 2015
Citations: 12

Abstract

In power systems with high penetration of wind generation, probabilistic scenarios are generated for use in stochastic formulations of day‐ahead unit commitment problems. To minimize the expected cost, the wind power scenarios should accurately represent the stochastic process for available wind power. We employ some statistical evaluation metrics to assess whether the scenario set possesses desirable properties that are expected to lead to a lower cost in stochastic unit commitment. A new mass transportation distance rank histogram is developed for assessing the reliability of unequally likely scenarios. Energy scores, rank histograms and Brier scores are applied to alternative sets of scenarios that are generated by two very different methods. The mass transportation distance rank histogram is best able to distinguish between sets of scenarios that are more or less calibrated according to their bias, variability and autocorrelation. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 12

  • Specifying and Validating Probabilistic Inputs for Prescriptive Models of Decision Making over Time, Women in Industrial and Systems Engineering, 10.1007/978-3-030-11866-2_3, (49-69), (2020).
  • Assessment of wind power scenario creation methods for stochastic power systems operations, Applied Energy, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114986, 268, (114986), (2020).
  • Mape_Maker: A Scenario Creator, Energy Systems, 10.1007/s12667-020-00408-6, (2020).
  • Stochastic vs. deterministic scheduling of a combined natural gas and power system with uncertain wind energy, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.12.047, 108, (303-313), (2019).
  • Observational data-based quality assessment of scenario generation for stochastic programs, Computational Management Science, 10.1007/s10287-019-00349-1, (2019).
  • Constructing probabilistic scenarios for wide-area solar power generation, Solar Energy, 10.1016/j.solener.2017.11.067, 160, (153-167), (2018).
  • Large-scale unit commitment under uncertainty: an updated literature survey, Annals of Operations Research, 10.1007/s10479-018-3003-z, 271, 1, (11-85), (2018).
  • undefined, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS), 10.1109/PMAPS.2018.8440563, (1-6), (2018).
  • Statistical reliability of wind power scenarios and stochastic unit commitment cost, Energy Systems, 10.1007/s12667-017-0255-7, 9, 4, (873-898), (2017).
  • Generating short‐term probabilistic wind power scenarios via nonparametric forecast error density estimators, Wind Energy, 10.1002/we.2129, 20, 12, (1911-1925), (2017).
  • Towards Improved Understanding of the Applicability of Uncertainty Forecasts in the Electric Power Industry, Energies, 10.3390/en10091402, 10, 9, (1402), (2017).
  • Reliability assessment of scenarios generated for stock index returns incorporating momentum, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 10.1002/ijfe.2002, 0, 0, (undefined).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.