The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Advanced Review

Nanoscale imaging in DNA nanotechnology

Ralf Jungmann

Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Max Scheible

Department of Physics, ZNN/WSI, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Friedrich C. Simmel

Corresponding Author

E-mail address:simmel@ph.tum.de

Department of Physics, ZNN/WSI, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany

Department of Physics, ZNN/WSI, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany
Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 November 2011
Cited by: 12

Abstract

DNA nanotechnology has developed powerful techniques for the construction of precisely defined molecular structures and machines, and nanoscale imaging methods have always been crucial for their experimental characterization. While initially atomic force microscopy (AFM) was the most widely employed imaging method for DNA‐based molecular structures, in recent years a variety of other techniques were adopted by researchers in the field, namely electron microscopy (EM), super‐resolution fluorescence microscopy, and high‐speed AFM. EM is now typically applied for the characterization of compact nanoobjects and three‐dimensional (3D) origami structures, as it offers better resolution than AFM and can be used for 3D reconstruction from single‐particle analysis. While the small size of DNA nanostructures had previously precluded the application of fluorescence microscopic methods, the development of super‐resolution microscopy now facilities the application of fast and powerful optical methods also in DNA nanotechnology. In particular, the observation of dynamical processes associated with DNA nanoassemblies—e.g., molecular walkers and machines—requires imaging techniques that are both fast and allow observation under native conditions. Here single‐molecule fluorescence techniques and high‐speed AFM are beginning to play an increasingly important role. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2012, 4:66–81. doi: 10.1002/wnan.173

This article is categorized under:

  • Nanotechnology Approaches to Biology > Nanoscale Systems in Biology

Number of times cited: 12

  • , Nanotechnologies for Basic Research Relevant to Medicine, The Handbook of Nanomedicine, 10.1007/978-1-4939-6966-1_3, (73-132), (2017).
  • , Sub–100-nm metafluorophores with digitally tunable optical properties self-assembled from DNA, Science Advances, 3, 6, (e1602128), (2017).
  • , Nanometrology and super-resolution imaging with DNA, MRS Bulletin, 10.1557/mrs.2017.274, 42, 12, (951-959), (2017).
  • , Physico‐chemical Characterization and Basic Research Principles of Advanced Drug Delivery Nanosystems, Intelligent Nanomaterials, (107-125), (2017).
  • , Cooperativity-based modeling of heterotypic DNA nanostructure assembly, Nucleic Acids Research, 43, 13, (6587), (2015).
  • , Electron Microscopic Visualization of Protein Assemblies on Flattened DNA Origami, ACS Nano, 9, 7, (7133), (2015).
  • , Multiplexed 3D cellular super-resolution imaging with DNA-PAINT and Exchange-PAINT, Nature Methods, 11, 3, (313), (2014).
  • , Sequence-specific recognition of DNA nanostructures, Methods, 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.02.028, 67, 2, (123-133), (2014).
  • , Single-molecule tools for enzymology, structural biology, systems biology and nanotechnology: an update, Archives of Toxicology, 88, 11, (1965), (2014).
  • , Comparison of four different particle sizing methods for siRNA polyplex characterization, European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 84, 2, (255), (2013).
  • , Investigating bioconjugation by atomic force microscopy, Journal of Nanobiotechnology, 10.1186/1477-3155-11-25, 11, 1, (25), (2013).
  • , From RNA Structures to RNA Nanomachines, The Nanobiotechnology Handbook, 10.1201/b12935-7, (113-126), (2013).