The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Article
Free Access

Open access metadata: current practices and proposed solutions

Chad HUTCHENS

Corresponding Author

University of Wyoming Libraries

Chad Hutchens

E‐Resources Librarian

University of Wyoming Libraries

Department 3334

1000 E. University Ave.

Laramie, WY 82071, USA

Tel.: +1 307‐766‐5560

Email: chutchen@uwyo.edu

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 July 2013
Cited by: 2

ABSTRACT

Nearly every major publisher offers open access content of some sort, but open access metadata standards are non‐existent amongst content providers. Users, librarians, content providers, and technology vendors who offer OpenURL resolvers and discovery services all stand to benefit from standardized ways to indicate what content is open access and what is not. Additionally, all stakeholders would benefit from a standardized method by which one can ascertain what form of open access any content may be; indeed, there are many definitions of open access. There is ample evidence that every publisher handles their content metadata differently and this creates inefficiencies in the scholarly information supply chain and leads to user confusion. Many initiatives are currently working on solutions to these problems including the NISO KBART workgroup, NISO's Open Discovery Initiative, and NISO's very recently created Open Access Initiative. There are also pre‐existing concepts based on services, such as CrossRef's CrossMark service and discovery systems that hold promise with respect to open access content and metadata.

Number of times cited: 2

  • , An Exploration of Indexed and Non-Indexed Open Access Journals: Identifying Metadata Coding Variations, Journal of Web Librarianship, 9, 2-3, (65), (2015).
  • , References, After the Book, 10.1533/9781780634050.195, (195-206), (2014).