TheOperational Code of John F. Kennedy During the Cuban Missile Crisis: A Comparison of Public and Private Rhetoric
Abstract
This study examines the manner in which the Cuban missile crisis affected the belief system of President John F. Kennedy. The analysis uses data derived from primary source materials that have become available only in the last 2 years, in addition to well‐known public statements by the president. The Verbs in Context System (VICS) was used to generate insights into how Kennedy's operational code differed across sources and changed during the period of the crisis. The results provide evidence of Kennedy's initial private belligerence and provisional support for the ‘Gettysburg thesis’ while calling into question some other potential interpretations of the effects of the crisis on the president's beliefs.
Citing Literature
Number of times cited: 21
- Rongxing Guo, Cross-Border Resource Management, Cross-Border Resource Management, 10.1016/B978-0-444-64002-4.00005-2, (109-137), (2018).
- Yi Edward Yang, Jonathan W. Keller and Joseph Molnar, An Operational Code Analysis of China’s National Defense White Papers: 1998-2015, Journal of Chinese Political Science, 10.1007/s11366-017-9524-5, 23, 4, (585-602), (2017).
- Tony C. Lee, Can Xi Jinping be the next Mao Zedong? Using the Big Five Model to Study Political Leadership, Journal of Chinese Political Science, 10.1007/s11366-018-9540-0, 23, 4, (473-497), (2018).
- Esra Cuhadar, Juliet Kaarbo, Baris Kesgin and Binnur Ozkececi‐Taner, Personality or Role? Comparisons of Turkish Leaders Across Different Institutional Positions, Political Psychology, 38, 1, (39-54), (2016).
- Hayden Smith and Niall Michelsen, Pursuing Ideology with Statecraft, Journal of Political Science Education, 13, 3, (317), (2017).
- Esra Cuhadar, Juliet Kaarbo, Baris Kesgin and Binnur Ozkececi-Taner, Examining leaders’ orientations to structural constraints: Turkey’s 1991 and 2003 Iraq war decisions, Journal of International Relations and Development, 20, 1, (29), (2017).
- Huiyun Feng and Kai He, Prospect theory, operational code analysis, and risk-taking behaviour: a new model of China’s crisis behaviour, Contemporary Politics, (1), (2017).
- Julia Macdonald and Jacquelyn Schneider, Presidential Risk Orientation and Force Employment Decisions, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61, 3, (511), (2017).
- Femke van Esch and Eelke de Jong, National culture trumps EU socialization: the European central bankers’ views of the euro crisis, Journal of European Public Policy, (1), (2017).
- Mischa Hansel, Cyber-attacks and psychological IR perspectives: explaining misperceptions and escalation risks, Journal of International Relations and Development, (2016).
- Stephen Benedict Dyson and Alexandra L. Raleigh, Public and private beliefs of political leaders: Saddam Hussein in front of a crowd and behind closed doors, Research & Politics, 1, 1, (205316801453780), (2014).
- Femke A.W.J. Van Esch, Exploring the Keynesian–Ordoliberal Divide. Flexibility and Convergence in French and German Leaders’ Economic Ideas During the Euro-Crisis, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 22, 3, (288), (2014).
- Robert L. Hogenraad, The fetish of archives, Quality & Quantity, 48, 1, (425), (2014).
- Yong-Soo Eun, The power of human beliefs over the state’s behaviour in world politics: An in-depth and comparative case study, International Political Science Review, 34, 4, (372), (2013).
- Jonathan Renshon, When Public Statements Reveal Private Beliefs: Assessing Operational Codes at a Distance, Political Psychology, 30, 4, (649-661), (2009).
- Andrew Bennett, Building Communities, Bridging Gaps: Alexander George's Contributions to Research Methods, Political Psychology, 29, 4, (489-507), (2008).
- MARK SCHAFER, SAM ROBISON and BRADLEY ALDRICH, Operational Codes and the 1916 Easter Rising in Ireland: A Test of the Frustration–Aggression Hypothesis, Foreign Policy Analysis, 2, 1, (63-82), (2006).
- MARK SCHAFER and STEPHEN G. WALKER, Democratic Leaders and the Democratic Peace: The Operational Codes of Tony Blair and Bill Clinton, International Studies Quarterly, 50, 3, (561), (2006).
- B. Gregory Marfleet and Colleen Miller, Failure after 1441: Bush and Chirac in the UN Security Council, Foreign Policy Analysis, 1, 3, (333-360), (2005).
- Valerie M. Hudson, Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor‐Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations, Foreign Policy Analysis, 1, 1, (1-30), (2005).
- Scott Crichlow, Psychological Influences on the Policy Choices of Secretaries of State and Foreign Ministers, Cooperation and Conflict, 40, 2, (179), (2005).
