The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Original Article

Educational Equality: Luck Egalitarian, Pluralist and Complex

First published: 22 November 2013
Cited by: 5
Correspondence: John Calvert, College of Education, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.Email: john.calvert@pg.canterbury.ac.nz

Abstract

The basic principle of educational equality is that each child should receive an equally good education. This sounds appealing, but is rather vague and needs substantial working out. Also, educational equality faces all the objections to equality per se, plus others specific to its subject matter. Together these have eroded confidence in the viability of equality as an educational ideal. This article argues that equality of educational opportunity is not the best way of understanding educational equality. It focuses on Brighouse and Swift's well worked out meritocratic conception and finds it irretrievably flawed; they should, instead, have pursued a radical conception they only mention. This conception is used as a starting point for developing a luck egalitarian conception, pluralistic and complex in nature. It is argued that such a conception accounts for the appeal of equality of opportunity, fits with other values in education and meets many of the objections. Thus, equality is reasserted as what morally matters most in education.

Number of times cited: 5

  • , What's Wrong with Private Schools, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 52, 1, (19-35), (2018).
  • , Adequacy in Education and Normative School Choice, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 37, 2, (123), (2018).
  • , Educational Justice: Equality Versus Adequacy, Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, 10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_546-1, (1-5), (2017).
  • , Why should we demand equality of educational opportunity?, Theory and Research in Education, 14, 3, (333), (2016).
  • , Genug ist genug? Zur Kritik non-egalitaristischer Konzeptionen der Bildungsgerechtigkeit, Zeitschrift für Praktische Philosophie, 2, 1, (89), (2015).