The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Original Article

Can gains from early literacy interventions be sustained? The case of Reading Recovery

Rebecca Jesson

Corresponding Author

Faculty of Education, The University of Auckland, , New Zealand

Address for correspondence: Rebecca Jesson, Faculty of Education, The University of Auckland, New Zealand. E‐mail:

r.jesson@auckland.ac.nz

Search for more papers by this author
Libby Limbrick

Faculty of Education, The University of Auckland, , New Zealand

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 October 2013
Cited by: 6

Abstract

Early literacy interventions have demonstrated that pedagogically sound programmes can boost reading achievement for students who do not succeed in early literacy learning. However, there is less evidence as to what extent gains are maintained in subsequent years or the factors which may contribute to sustained progress. The research reported in this article employed a cross‐sectional design to investigate the achievement of students who had previously participated in Reading Recovery. Two to four years after successfully completing the intervention, students were assessed in reading and writing by using standardised assessment tools. Although 60% of students had retained parity in reading in comparison with their age cohort, 40% were markedly below the mean of the cohort and the national norm. Data from case study schools provide some initial suggestions for school implementation factors which affect continued success. Conclusions regarding the need to plan for sustainability of gains following early intervention are made.

Number of times cited: 6

  • , Examining the Sustained Effects of Reading Recovery, Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 22, 2, (116), (2017).
  • , Is Reading Recovery an Effective Intervention for Students with Reading Difficulties? A Critique of the i3 Scale-Up Study, Reading Psychology, 37, 7, (1025), (2016).
  • , Children's reading profiles on exiting the Reading Recovery programme: do they predict sustained progress?, Journal of Research in Reading, 39, 1, (1-18), (2014).
  • , Eleven Myths about Literacy Education in New Zealand, Excellence and Equity in Literacy Education, 10.1057/9781137415578_10, (214-235), (2015).
  • , Is Reading Recovery an Effective Early Literacy Intervention Programme for Children Who Most Need Literacy Supports?, Excellence and Equity in Literacy Education, 10.1057/9781137415578_3, (41-70), (2015).
  • , Reading Recovery's unrecovered learners: Characteristics and issues, Review of Education, , (2018).