The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Original Article

The contribution of knowledge about anaphors, organisational signals and refutations to reading comprehension

J. Ricardo García

Corresponding Author

Universidad de Salamanca, , Spain

Address for correspondence: J. Ricardo García, Department of Educational and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Education, Salamanca University, Pº Canalejas, 169 37008, Salamanca, Spain. E‐mail:

jrgarcia@usal.es

Search for more papers by this author
Andrea Bustos

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, , Chile

Search for more papers by this author
Emilio Sánchez

Universidad de Salamanca, , Spain

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 December 2013
Cited by: 4

Correction added on 16 January 2014 after first publication online on 19 December 2013. Due to an error, the ordering of the author names originally appeared in this article as García, Sánchez and Bustos, instead of the correct order of García, Bustos and Sánchez. This error has been corrected in this version of the article.

Abstract

Expository texts contain rhetorical devices that help readers to connect text ideas (within a text and with prior knowledge) and to monitor reading. Rhetorical competence addresses readers' skill in detecting, understanding and using these devices. We examined the contribution of rhetorical competence to reading comprehension on two groups of 11‐ to 13‐year‐old students: low‐level (Study 1) and high‐level (Study 2) reading skills. The measures of rhetorical competence assessed students' knowledge about anaphors, organisational signals and refutations. In both studies, each measure of rhetorical competence contributed significantly to reading comprehension once prior knowledge, working memory and decoding skills were controlled for. This contribution was higher in Study 2. Furthermore, whereas in Study 1, each measure of rhetorical competence had a unique contribution to reading comprehension when controlling for the other measures of rhetorical competence, in Study 2, only the knowledge about organisational signals and refutations had this unique contribution.

Number of times cited: 4

  • , Academic Language as a Predictor of Reading Comprehension in Monolingual Spanish‐Speaking Readers: Evidence From Chilean Early Adolescents, Reading Research Quarterly, 53, 2, (223-247), (2017).
  • , Comparing rhetorical devices in history textbooks and teachers’ lessons: Implications for the development of academic language skills, Linguistics and Education, 10.1016/j.linged.2018.07.004, 47, (16-26), (2018).
  • , Simplifying informational text structure for struggling readers, Reading and Writing, 10.1007/s11145-017-9785-6, 31, 9, (2191-2210), (2017).
  • , Does rhetorical competence moderate the effect of rhetorical devices on the comprehension of expository texts beyond general comprehension skills?, Reading and Writing, 30, 3, (439), (2017).