Evidence for a simplicity principle: teaching common complex grapheme‐to‐phonemes improves reading and motivation in at‐risk readers
Abstract
This study examines the effects of teaching common complex grapheme‐to‐phoneme correspondences (GPCs) on reading and reading motivation for at‐risk readers using a randomised control trial design with taught intervention and control conditions. One reading programme taught children complex GPCs ordered by their frequency of occurrence in children's texts (a ‘simplicity principle’). The other reading programme taught children word usage. Thirty‐eight students participated in the 9‐week programme of 30 supplemental small group sessions. Participants in the complex GPC group performed significantly better at post‐tests with generally large value‐added effect sizes (Cohen's d) at both by‐participant and by‐item for spelling, d = 1.85, d = 1.16; word recognition with words containing taught GPCs, d = 0.96, d = 0.95; word recognition, d = 0.79, d = 0.61, and reading motivation, d = 0.34, d = 0.56. These findings suggest that the simplicity principle aids in structuring maximally effective supplemental phonic interventions.
Number of times cited: 10
- Robert Savage, George Georgiou, Rauno Parrila and Kristina Maiorino, Preventative Reading Interventions Teaching Direct Mapping of Graphemes in Texts and Set-for-Variability Aid At-Risk Learners, Scientific Studies of Reading, (1), (2018).
- Laura M. Steacy, Amy M. Elleman and Donald L. Compton, Opening the “black box” of learning to read, Theories of Reading Development, 10.1075/swll.15.06ste, (99-122), (2017).
- Catherine A. Darnell, Jonathan E. Solity and Helen Wall, Decoding the phonics screening check, British Educational Research Journal, 43, 3, (505-527), (2017).
- Elisabeth A. T. Tilanus, Eliane Segers and Ludo Verhoeven, Responsiveness to Intervention in Children with Dyslexia, Dyslexia, 22, 3, (214-232), (2016).
- Victoria Chen and Robert S. Savage, Corrigendum to the ‘Evidence for a simplicity principle: teaching common complex grapheme‐to‐phonemes improves reading and motivation in at‐risk readers’ Journal of Research in Reading, 2014; 37(2): 196–214, Journal of Research in Reading, 39, 1, (126-131), (2016).
- R. Malatesha Joshi, Intervention and Assessment of Spelling Skills in LD Classrooms, Interventions in Learning Disabilities, 10.1007/978-3-319-31235-4_6, (91-103), (2016).
- Laura R. Shapiro and Jonathan Solity, Differing effects of two synthetic phonics programmes on early reading development, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 2, (182-203), (2015).
- Rhona Stainthorp, Dyslexia and Remediation/Education: Where Next?, Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 1, 4, (260), (2014).
- Lauren Stentiford, George Koutsouris and Brahm Norwich, A systematic literature review of the organisational arrangements of primary school‐based reading interventions for struggling readers, Journal of Research in Reading, , (2018).
- Genevieve McArthur, Yumi Sheehan, Nicholas A Badcock, Deanna A Francis, Hua-Chen Wang, Saskia Kohnen, Erin Banales, Thushara Anandakumar, Eva Marinus and Anne Castles, Phonics training for English-speaking poor readers, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 10.1002/14651858.CD009115.pub3, (2018).
