The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Original Article

What oral text reading fluency can reveal about reading comprehension

Nathalie J. Veenendaal

Corresponding Author

Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, , The Netherlands

Address for correspondence: Nathalie Veenendaal, Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands. E‐mail:

n.veenendaal@pwo.ru.nl

Search for more papers by this author
Margriet A. Groen

Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, , The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Ludo Verhoeven

Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, , The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 February 2014
Cited by: 11

Abstract

Text reading fluency – the ability to read quickly, accurately and with a natural intonation – has been proposed as a predictor of reading comprehension. In the current study, we examined the role of oral text reading fluency, defined as text reading rate and text reading prosody, as a contributor to reading comprehension outcomes in addition to decoding efficiency and language comprehension. One hundred and six Dutch primary school children from fourth grade participated in this study and were assessed on decoding efficiency, vocabulary, syntactic ability, reading fluency performance and reading comprehension skills. Regression analysis showed that text reading prosody, not text reading rate, explained additional variance in reading comprehension performance when decoding efficiency and language comprehension were controlled for. This result suggests that the inclusion of text reading prosody as an aspect of text reading fluency is justified and that a natural intonation is associated with better comprehension of what is read.

Number of times cited: 11

  • , The role text structure inference skill plays for eighth graders’ expository text comprehension, Reading and Writing, 10.1007/s11145-017-9801-x, 31, 9, (2065-2094), (2017).
  • , Differential lexical predictors of reading comprehension in fourth graders, Reading and Writing, 30, 3, (489), (2017).
  • , How working memory relates to children’s reading comprehension: the importance of domain-specificity in storage and processing, Reading and Writing, 30, 1, (105), (2017).
  • , Lexical prosody as an aspect of oral reading fluency, Reading and Writing, 30, 1, (143), (2017).
  • , Growth in Oral Reading Fluency in a Semitransparent Orthography: Concurrent and Predictive Relations With Reading Proficiency in Norwegian, Grades 2–5, Reading Research Quarterly, 52, 2, (177-201), (2016).
  • , Using Eye Movements to Study Reading Processes, Eye-Tracking Technology Applications in Educational Research, 10.4018/978-1-5225-1005-5.ch002, (27-47)
  • , The Contribution of Segmental and Suprasegmental Phonology to Reading Comprehension, Reading Research Quarterly, 51, 1, (55-66), (2015).
  • , Bidirectional Relations Between Text Reading Prosody and Reading Comprehension in the Upper Primary School Grades: A Longitudinal Perspective, Scientific Studies of Reading, 20, 3, (189), (2016).
  • , The role of prosody in reading comprehension: evidence from poor comprehenders, Journal of Research in Reading, , (2018).
  • , What is the relationship between reading prosody and reading comprehension in European Portuguese? Evidence from grades 2 to 5, Journal of Research in Reading, , (2018).
  • , Academic Vocabulary and Reading Fluency: Unlikely Bedfellows in the Quest for Textual Meaning, Education Sciences, 10.3390/educsci8040165, 8, 4, (165), (2018).