The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Original Article

When kids act out: a comparison of embodied methods to improve children's memory for a story

Molly Berenhaus

Corresponding Author

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, , Brighton, UK

Address for correspondence: Molly Berenhaus, Pevensey Building, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QH, UK. E‐mail:

m.berenhaus@sussex.ac.uk

Search for more papers by this author
Jane Oakhill

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, , Brighton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Jennifer Rusted

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, , Brighton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 December 2014
Cited by: 4

Abstract

Over the last decade, embodied cognition, the idea that sensorimotor processes facilitate higher cognitive processes, has proven useful for improving children's memory for a story. In order to compare the benefits of two embodiment techniques, active experiencing (AE) and indexing, for children's memory for a story, we compared the immediate recall of different types of idea units across three conditions. Participants were between the ages of 7 and 11 and were randomly allocated to experimental conditions. The experimental groups were matched on comprehension ability and age. In the indexing condition, children acted out a short story using a playset (i.e., a Playmobil® playset with figurines), in the AE condition, children read the story using enactment, and during the control condition, children simply read the story. We predicted that children in the indexing condition would recall more action‐based idea units, whilst children in the AE condition would recall more descriptive and dialogic idea units. Children in the AE condition recalled more descriptive idea units than in the control condition, whilst in the indexing condition, only poorer comprehenders recalled more descriptive information. Our findings suggest that these two embodiment techniques effect different components of reading comprehension and that future research should investigate these differences more specifically.

Number of times cited: 4

  • , Children's Enactment of Characters' Movements: A Novel Measure of Spatial Situation Model Representations and Indicator of Comprehension, Mind, Brain, and Education, 11, 3, (112-120), (2017).
  • , Effects of a Reading Strategy Training Aimed at Improving Mental Simulation in Primary School Children, Educational Psychology Review, 29, 4, (869), (2017).
  • , Scaffolding Narrative Skills: A Meta-Analysis of Instruction in Early Childhood Settings, Early Education and Development, 28, 7, (773), (2017).
  • , A Narrative Review of School-Based Physical Activity for Enhancing Cognition and Learning: The Importance of Relevancy and Integration, Frontiers in Psychology, 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02079, 9, (2018).