The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Original Article

The role of word decoding, vocabulary knowledge and meta‐cognitive knowledge in monolingual and bilingual low‐achieving adolescents' reading comprehension

Roel van Steensel

Corresponding Author

Department of Pedagogical Sciences, Erasmus University, , Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Address for correspondence: Roel van Steensel, Pedagogical Sciences, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E‐mail:

roelvansteensel@gmail.com

Search for more papers by this author
Ron Oostdam

Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, , Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Amos van Gelderen

Kohnstamm Institute, University of Amsterdam, , Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Erik van Schooten

Kohnstamm Institute, University of Amsterdam, , Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 December 2014
Cited by: 3

Abstract

In this study, we analysed the relationships between word decoding, vocabulary knowledge, meta‐cognitive knowledge and reading comprehension in low‐achieving adolescents and examined whether the strength of these relationships differed between Grade 7 and 9 students and between monolingual and bilingual students. Tests were administered to 328 students in Dutch prevocational education. Multilevel analyses showed positive effects of vocabulary and meta‐cognitive knowledge on reading comprehension that were consistent across grades and across monolinguals and bilinguals. Additionally, we found a positive effect of word decoding for seventh graders, but no effect for ninth graders. There was also a positive effect of bilingualism on reading comprehension when vocabulary differences were controlled. This finding suggests that for bilingual students, reading comprehension is hampered by limited second‐language vocabulary knowledge and that these students will profit more from an increase in vocabulary knowledge than their monolingual peers. The results underline the importance of vocabulary and meta‐cognitive instruction for low‐achieving adolescents.

Number of times cited: 3

  • , Effects of reciprocal teaching on reading comprehension of low‐achieving adolescents. The importance of specific teacher skills, Journal of Research in Reading, 41, 1, (20-41), (2016).
  • , Writing proficiency level and writing development of low-achieving adolescents: the roles of linguistic knowledge, fluency, and metacognitive knowledge, Reading and Writing, (2018).
  • , Differential lexical predictors of reading comprehension in fourth graders, Reading and Writing, 30, 3, (489), (2017).