The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Special Issue Article

Language profiles of poor comprehenders in English and French

Nadia D'Angelo

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: n.dangelo@utoronto.ca

Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, , Ontario, Canada

Nadia D'Angelo, Department of Applied Psychology and Human Development, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. E‐mail:

n.dangelo@utoronto.ca

Search for more papers by this author
Xi Chen

Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, , Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 September 2016
Cited by: 1

Abstract

This study explored components of language comprehension (vocabulary, grammar, and higher‐level language) skills for poor comprehenders in French immersion. We identified three groups of bilingual comprehenders (poor, average, and good) based on English reading performance and compared their language comprehension skills in English L1 and French L2. We also identified and compared English skills for three groups of monolingual comprehenders from English‐stream programmes. Among both bilingual and monolingual learners, poor comprehenders performed significantly lower than good comprehenders on English vocabulary, morphological awareness, and inference. Bilingual poor comprehenders also differed from average comprehenders on English morphological awareness and inference. Similar results were found in French for the bilingual learners. Lower scores on French vocabulary and morphological awareness distinguished between bilingual poor and good comprehenders. Additionally, weaknesses in French semantics and inference distinguished between bilingual poor and good comprehenders and bilingual poor and average comprehenders. These results suggest that poor comprehenders share remarkably similar language characteristics in L1 and L2.

Number of times cited: 1

  • , Understanding poor comprehenders in different orthographies: Universal versus language‐specific skills, Journal of Research in Reading, 40, 2, (119-124), (2017).