The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Debates and Developments

Jane Jacobs' ‘Cities First’ Model and Archaeological Reality

Michael E. Smith

E-mail address: mesmith9@asu.edu

School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jason Ur

E-mail address: jasonur@fas.harvard.edu

Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, 11 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA, 02138 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Gary M. Feinman

E-mail address: gfeinman@fieldmuseum.org

Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL, 60605 USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 April 2014
Cited by: 10

This manuscript was strengthened by critical comments from Benjamin Stanley, George Cowgill, Linda Nicholas, Barbara Stark, Abigail York, Benjamin Arbuckle and Ofer Bar‐Yosef. We thank three anonymous IJURR reviewers for helping us refine our argument.

Abstract

In The Economy of Cities, Jane Jacobs conjectured that the world's first cities preceded the origins of agriculture, a proposition that was most recently revived by Peter Taylor in the pages of this journal. Jacobs' idea was out of line with extant archaeological findings when first advanced decades ago, and it remains firmly contradicted by a much fuller corpus of data today. After a review of how and why Jacobs formulated her ‘cities first’ model, we review current archaeological knowledge from the Near East, China and Mesoamerica to document the temporal precedence of agriculture before urbanism in each of these regions. Contrary to the opinions of Jacobs and Taylor, archaeological data are in fact sufficiently robust to reconstruct patterns of diet, settlement and social organization in the past, and to assign dates to the relevant sites. Our response illustrates how generations of archaeological discoveries have yielded solid empirical foundations for the evaluation of wider social scientific debates.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 10

  • , Cities in climate change, International Journal of Urban Sciences, 21, 1, (1), (2017).
  • , Knowledges in Disciplines and Cities: An Essay on Relations Between Archaeology and Social Sciences, Mobilities of Knowledge, 10.1007/978-3-319-44654-7_7, (123-137), (2017).
  • , The Urban Quandary and the ‘Mega-Site’ from the Çatalhöyük Perspective, Journal of World Prehistory, 10.1007/s10963-017-9103-x, 30, 3, (189-206), (2017).
  • , Multiple Pathways to Large-Scale Human Cooperative Networks: A Reframing, Feast, Famine or Fighting?, 10.1007/978-3-319-48402-0_17, (459-478), (2017).
  • , Processes of social flourishing and their liminal collapse: elements to a genealogy of globalization, The British Journal of Sociology, 67, 3, (435), (2016).
  • , Human control of climate: introducing cities, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 10.1177/0308518X15592297, 47, 5, (1023-1028), (2015).
  • , Post‐Childe, Post‐Wirth: Response to Smith, Ur and Feinman, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39, 1, (168-171), (2014).
  • , Editor's Introduction Public Intellectuals: Jane Jacobs and Henry George, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 74, 3, (457), (2015).
  • , Theorizing the Premodern City, Urban Theory, 10.1007/978-1-137-38266-5_2, (21-29), (2014).
  • , Diverse diversities—Open innovation in small towns and rural areas, Growth and Change, , (2019).