Volume 19, Issue 6
Original Article

Development of the Knee OA Pre‐Screening Questionnaire

Flavia Yázigi

Corresponding Author

Univ Lisboa, Fac Motricidade Humana, CIPER, LBMF, P‐1499‐002, Lisbon, Portugal

Correspondence: Assistant Professor Flávia Yázigi, MS. PhD student. Faculty of Human Kinetics. Estrada da Costa.1499‐002 Cruz Quebrada ‐ Dafundo. Lisbon. Portugal. Email:

fyazigi@fmh.ulisboa.pt

Search for more papers by this author
Filomena Carnide

Univ Lisboa, Fac Motricidade Humana, CIPER, LBMF, P‐1499‐002, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Margarida Espanha

Univ Lisboa, Fac Motricidade Humana, CIPER, LBMF, P‐1499‐002, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Miguel Sousa

Portuguese Institute of Rheumatology, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 September 2014
Citations: 2

Abstract

Aim

Self‐report questionnaires are still considered to be a useful instrument for disease screening and for epidemiological studies. Few questionnaires have been developed for the purpose of screening for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The aim of this study was to develop a KOA screening tool that is useful for health and exercise professionals who do not have access to advanced and costly diagnostic instruments.

Methods

This study comprised five steps: content validity, reliability, criterion validity, construct validity and responsiveness. Internal consistency was verified using Cronbach's alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Reproducibility was analyzed using the ICC (1 week). Criterion validity was assessed by comparing the Knee OA Pre‐Screening Questionnaire (KOPS) score with the Short Form (SF)12, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores questionnaire and the 6 min walk test. Construct validity was verified using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (American College of Rheumatology clinical criteria and X‐ray). Responsiveness was analyzed over 3 months of an aquatic exercise program using the pooled effect size.

Results

The overall KOPS score yielded a Cronbach's alpha of 0.747 and an ICC of 0.646. KOPS was considered reproducible (ICC: 0.895–0.992; Cronbach's alpha: 0.894–0.979). The ROC curve revealed a sensitivity of 86.96 and a specificity of 75.82. The KOPS demonstrated medium responsiveness in terms of the total score and the pain and symptoms components.

Conclusion

The KOPS questionnaire is valid for the purposes for which it was created, and its translation into English should be considered.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.