Volume 16, Issue 4
Original Article

Spatial and temporal variation in pollinator community structure relative to a woodland–almond plantation edge

Manu E. Saunders

Corresponding Author

School of Environmental Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Elizabeth Mitchell Drive, Albury, New South Wales, 2640 Australia

Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Elizabeth Mitchell Drive, Albury, New South Wales, 2640 Australia

Correspondence: Manu E. Saunders. Tel.: +61 2 6051 9850; fax: +61 2 6051 9897; e‐mail: masaunders@csu.edu.auSearch for more papers by this author
Gary W. Luck

Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Elizabeth Mitchell Drive, Albury, New South Wales, 2640 Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 27 May 2014
Citations: 11

Abstract

  1. Agricultural landscape elements, such as field edges, are not always a barrier to insects but can influence their distribution and dispersal behaviour.
  2. The present study investigated spatial and temporal patterns in wild pollinator (fly, wasp and non‐Apis bee) distribution across an edge between natural mallee woodland and monoculture almond plantations in southern Australia, during the critical almond flowering period. This is the first study of variation in pollinator community distribution on both sides of an edge between natural vegetation and flowering tree crop plantations. Species richness, diversity and evenness (SHE) analysis was also used to identify changes in pollinator community structure relative to the edge.
  3. It is shown that the spatial distribution and structure of pollinator communities can vary across a habitat edge with an abrupt temporal changes in resources. Our results suggest that the plantation edge did not prevent wild pollinators spilling over from woodlands, although vegetation homogeneity and phenological changes in resources most likely influenced the dispersal of pollinators into plantation interiors.
  4. The findings of the present study contribute to our knowledge of edge responses by insects in managed landscapes and could motivate growers to adopt ecological management practices in commercial plantations. Future studies of insects near farmland edges should include samples on both sides of the edge and should also consider the landscape context.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 11

  • The Optimal Supply of Crop Pollination and Honey From Wild and Managed Bees: An Analytical Framework for Diverse Socio-Economic and Ecological Settings, Ecological Economics, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.11.018, 157, (278-290), (2019).
  • The influence of garden flowers on pollinator visits to forest flowers: comparison of bumblebee habitat use between urban and natural areas, Urban Ecosystems, 10.1007/s11252-019-00891-5, (2019).
  • Disappearing edge: the flowering period changes the distribution of insect pollinators in invasive goldenrod patches, Insect Conservation and Diversity, 10.1111/icad.12305, 12, 2, (98-108), (2018).
  • Wildflower Plantings Do Not Compete With Neighboring Almond Orchards for Pollinator Visits, Environmental Entomology, 10.1093/ee/nvx052, 46, 3, (559-564), (2017).
  • The proportion of impervious surfaces at the landscape scale structures wild bee assemblages in a densely populated region, Ecology and Evolution, 10.1002/ece3.2374, 6, 18, (6599-6615), (2016).
  • Spill-over of pest control and pollination services into arable crops, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.023, 231, (15-23), (2016).
  • An expert-assisted citizen science program involving agricultural high schools provides national patterns on bee species assemblages, Journal of Insect Conservation, 10.1007/s10841-016-9927-1, 20, 5, (905-918), (2016).
  • Landscape structure influences bee community and coffee pollination at different spatial scales, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 10.1016/j.agee.2016.10.008, 235, (1-12), (2016).
  • Resource connectivity for beneficial insects in landscapes dominated by monoculture tree crop plantations, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 10.1080/14735903.2015.1025496, 14, 1, (82-99), (2015).
  • A Systematic Review of the Benefits and Costs of Bird and Insect Activity in Agroecosystems, Springer Science Reviews, 10.1007/s40362-015-0035-5, 3, 2, (113-125), (2015).
  • Keystone resources available to wild pollinators in a winter‐flowering tree crop plantation, Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 10.1111/afe.12084, 17, 1, (90-101), (2014).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.