Descriptive and Substantive Representation in Congress: Evidence from 80,000 Congressional Inquiries
A previous version of this article was presented at the 2017 annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago. We thank Ben Bishin, Daniel Butler, Jason Coronel, Jason MacDonald, Jennifer Merolla, Ben Newman, and Sono Shah for helpful comments and suggestions. Special thanks to CW5 Jeffrey Freelove, USA, Ret.
Abstract
A vast literature debates the efficacy of descriptive representation in legislatures. Though studies argue it influences how communities are represented through constituency service, they are limited since legislators' service activities are unobserved. Using Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, we collected 88,000 records of communication between members of the U.S. Congress and federal agencies during the 108th–113th Congresses. These legislative interventions allow us to examine members' “follow‐through” with policy implementation. We find that women, racial/ethnic minorities, and veterans are more likely to work on behalf of constituents with whom they share identities. Including veterans offers leverage in understanding the role of political cleavages and shared experiences. Our findings suggest that shared experiences operate as a critical mechanism for representation, that a lack of political consensus is not necessary for substantive representation, and that the causal relationships identified by experimental work have observable implications in the daily work of Congress.
Citing Literature
Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 12
- Nichole M. Bauer, , The Qualifications Gap, 10.1017/9781108864503, (2020).
- Morgan C. Matthews, Women in State Political Parties, Contexts, 10.1177/1536504220950405, 19, 3, (68-70), (2020).
- Tiffany D. Barnes, Mirya R. Holman, Essential Work Is Gender Segregated: This Shapes the Gendered Representation of Essential Workers in Political Office, Social Science Quarterly, 10.1111/ssqu.12850, 101, 5, (1827-1833), (2020).
- John Brooks, Sara Chatfield, Mind the gap: Examining the role of gender in campaign staffing and compensation, Electoral Studies, 10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102208, 67, (102208), (2020).
- Jeremy Gelman, Partisan Intensity in Congress: Evidence from Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court Nomination, Political Research Quarterly, 10.1177/1065912920911464, (106591292091146), (2020).
- Pascasie Minani Passy, Abdoulaye Gueye, Devine qui s’invite aux élections cette année ! Les minorités visibles et leur représentation politique en Ontario et en Colombie-Britannique (Canada), Social Science Information, 10.1177/0539018420926308, (053901842092630), (2020).
- Thomas J. Hayes, Benjamin G. Bishin, Do elected officials serve the poor on health care? Evidence from a field experiment on members of congress and state legislators, The Social Science Journal, 10.1080/03623319.2020.1783963, (1-17), (2020).
- Alper T. Bulut, What Drives Women’s Substantive Representation in Muslim-Majority Countries? Lessons from Turkey, Political Research Quarterly, 10.1177/1065912920948135, (106591292094813), (2020).
- Feodor Snagovsky, Woo Chang Kang, Jillian Sheppard, Nicholas Biddle, Does descriptive representation increase perceptions of legitimacy? Evidence from Australia, Australian Journal of Political Science, 10.1080/10361146.2020.1804834, (1-21), (2020).
- Michal Mochtak, Mythologizing war: legacies of conflict in Croatian parliamentary debates, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 10.1080/14683857.2020.1800283, (1-23), (2020).
- Melinda N. Ritchie, Hye Young You, Women’s Advancement in Politics: Evidence from Congressional Staff, The Journal of Politics, 10.1086/710324, (2020).
- Leonard L. Lira, Janani Chandrasekar, The State of Research in Veterans Studies: A Systematic Literature Review, Journal of Veterans Studies, 10.21061/jvs.v6i2.191, 6, 2, (46), (2020).
