The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Original Article

Explaining Suicide in Organizations: Durkheim Revisited

Stewart Clegg

Stewart Clegg is Professor at Management Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia. E‐mail: s.clegg@uts.edu.au.

Search for more papers by this author
Miguel Pina E Cunha

Miguel Pina E Cunha is at Nova School of Business and Economics, Lisboa, Portugal.

Search for more papers by this author
Arménio Rego

Arménio Rego is at Católica Porto Business School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, Portugal.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 September 2016
Cited by: 2

Abstract

Drawing on Durkheim's concept of anomie, we address the under‐explored phenomenon of anomic suicide in contemporary organizations and discuss the consequences of solidarity for organizations and society. The relations of social solidarity to issues of identity and insecurity are explored through the cases of France Telecom Orange and Foxconn. Remedial implications for organizing, considered as community building, are discussed. Durkheim wrote not only about anomic but also altruistic suicide. We will also analyze examples of this type of suicide. Some tentative suggestions are made for how to organize to minimize the incidence of suicidal violence in organizations.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 2

  • , How Does Performance Management Affect Workers? Beyond Human Resource Management and Its Critique, International Journal of Management Reviews, 21, 1, (76-96), (2018).
  • , Reading Bauman and Retrotopia, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 10.1016/j.scaman.2018.03.001, 34, 4, (354-363), (2018).