Volume 69, Issue 3
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

BAS: Balanced Acceptance Sampling of Natural Resources

B. L. Robertson

Corresponding Author

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand

email: blair.robertson@canterbury.ac.nzSearch for more papers by this author
J. A. Brown

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand

Search for more papers by this author
T. McDonald

Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc., Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
P. Jaksons

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 July 2013
Citations: 30

Summary

To design an efficient survey or monitoring program for a natural resource it is important to consider the spatial distribution of the resource. Generally, sample designs that are spatially balanced are more efficient than designs which are not. A spatially balanced design selects a sample that is evenly distributed over the extent of the resource. In this article we present a new spatially balanced design that can be used to select a sample from discrete and continuous populations in multi‐dimensional space. The design, which we call balanced acceptance sampling, utilizes the Halton sequence to assure spatial diversity of selected locations. Targeted inclusion probabilities are achieved by acceptance sampling. The BAS design is conceptually simpler than competing spatially balanced designs, executes faster, and achieves better spatial balance as measured by a number of quantities. The algorithm has been programed in an R package freely available for download.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 30

  • A sample coordination method to monitor totals of environmental variables, Environmetrics, 10.1002/env.2625, 31, 6, (2020).
  • Sequential process to choose efficient sampling design based on partial prior information data and simulations, Spatial Statistics, 10.1016/j.spasta.2020.100439, (100439), (2020).
  • Combining spatially balanced sampling, route optimisation and remote sensing to assess biodiversity response to reclamation practices on semi-arid well pads, Biodiversity, 10.1080/14888386.2020.1733085, (1-11), (2020).
  • Setting up an efficient survey of Aedes albopictus in an unfamiliar urban area, Urban Ecosystems, 10.1007/s11252-020-01041-y, (2020).
  • The Fate of Deep-Sea Coral Reefs on Seamounts in a Fishery-Seascape: What Are the Impacts, What Remains, and What Is Protected?, Frontiers in Marine Science, 10.3389/fmars.2020.567002, 7, (2020).
  • Spatially balanced designs for transect‐based surveys, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10.1111/2041-210X.13321, 11, 1, (95-105), (2019).
  • Bayesian model based spatiotemporal survey designs and partially observed log Gaussian Cox process, Spatial Statistics, 10.1016/j.spasta.2019.100392, (100392), (2019).
  • Spatially balanced sampling and ground‐level imagery for vegetation monitoring on reclaimed well pads, Restoration Ecology, 10.1111/rec.12956, 27, 5, (974-980), (2019).
  • Spatially balanced sampling designs for environmental surveys, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 10.1007/s10661-019-7666-y, 191, 8, (2019).
  • Investigating time and economic costs of botrytis bunch rot sampling using interpolated data, New Zealand Plant Protection, 10.30843/nzpp.2019.72.266, 72, (166-175), (2019).
  • Using adaptive line-transect sampling in airborne geophysics studies, Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 10.1080/03610918.2017.1395041, 48, 3, (675-683), (2018).
  • Optimizing cost-efficiency of long term monitoring programs by using spatially balanced sampling designs: The case of manila clams in Arcachon bay, Ecological Informatics, 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2018.11.005, (2018).
  • Using balanced acceptance sampling as a master sample for environmental surveys, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10.1111/2041-210X.13003, 9, 7, (1718-1726), (2018).
  • Spatially Balanced Sampling of Continuous Populations, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 10.1111/sjos.12322, 45, 3, (792-805), (2018).
  • Towards robust and repeatable sampling methods in eDNA‐based studies, Molecular Ecology Resources, 10.1111/1755-0998.12907, 18, 5, (940-952), (2018).
  • Trend estimation for complex survey designs of water chemistry indicators from Sierra Nevada Lakes, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 10.1007/s10661-018-6963-1, 190, 10, (2018).
  • Identifying and detecting potentially adverse ecological outcomes associated with the release of gene-drive modified organisms, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 10.1080/23299460.2017.1415585, 5, sup1, (S139-S158), (2018).
  • An evaluation of the error and uncertainty in epibenthos cover estimates from AUV images collected with an efficient, spatially-balanced design, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0203827, 13, 9, (e0203827), (2018).
  • Halton iterative partitioning: spatially balanced sampling via partitioning, Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 10.1007/s10651-018-0406-6, (2018).
  • Application of Balanced Acceptance Sampling to an Intertidal Survey, Journal of Landscape Ecology, 10.1515/jlecol-2017-0012, 10, 1, (96-107), (2017).
  • A modification of balanced acceptance sampling, Statistics & Probability Letters, 10.1016/j.spl.2017.05.004, 129, (107-112), (2017).
  • Optimization of a survey using spatially balanced sampling: a single-year application of clam monitoring in the Arcachon Bay (SW France), Aquatic Living Resources, 10.1051/alr/2017036, 30, (37), (2017).
  • Spatially balanced designs that incorporate legacy sites, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10.1111/2041-210X.12782, 8, 11, (1433-1442), (2017).
  • A spatially balanced design with probability function proportional to the within sample distance, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.201600194, 59, 5, (1067-1084), (2017).
  • Spatially-balanced adaptive web sampling, Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 10.1007/s10651-015-0336-5, 23, 2, (219-231), (2016).
  • A General-Purpose Spatial Survey Design for Collaborative Science and Monitoring of Global Environmental Change: The Global Grid, Remote Sensing, 10.3390/rs8100813, 8, 10, (813), (2016).
  • Spatial Sampling Designs, Sampling Spatial Units for Agricultural Surveys, 10.1007/978-3-662-46008-5_7, (149-196), (2015).
  • Statistics in Environmental Management, An Integrated Approach to Environmental Management, 10.1002/9781118744406.ch16, (383-396), (2015).
  • Spatially Balanced Sampling: Application to Environmental Surveys, Procedia Environmental Sciences, 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.07.108, 27, (6-9), (2015).
  • Balanced sampling: A versatile sampling approach for statistical soil surveys, Geoderma, 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.04.009, 253-254, (111-121), (2015).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.