Volume 71, Issue 2
BIOMETRIC PRACTICE

Sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) with adaptive randomization for quality improvement in depression treatment program

Ying Kuen Cheung

Corresponding Author

Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 West 168th Street, New York, New York 10032, U.S.A.

email: yc632@columbia.eduSearch for more papers by this author
Bibhas Chakraborty

Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 West 168th Street, New York, New York 10032, U.S.A.

Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke‐NUS Graduate Medical School, 20 College Road, Singapore 169856, Singapore

Search for more papers by this author
Karina W. Davidson

Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, New York, New York 10032, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 October 2014
Citations: 20

Summary

Implementation study is an important tool for deploying state‐of‐the‐art treatments from clinical efficacy studies into a treatment program, with the dual goals of learning about effectiveness of the treatments and improving the quality of care for patients enrolled into the program. In this article, we deal with the design of a treatment program of dynamic treatment regimens (DTRs) for patients with depression post‐acute coronary syndrome. We introduce a novel adaptive randomization scheme for a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial of DTRs. Our approach adapts the randomization probabilities to favor treatment sequences having comparatively superior Q‐functions used in Q‐learning. The proposed approach addresses three main concerns of an implementation study: it allows incorporation of historical data or opinions, it includes randomization for learning purposes, and it aims to improve care via adaptation throughout the program. We demonstrate how to apply our method to design a depression treatment program using data from a previous study. By simulation, we illustrate that the inputs from historical data are important for the program performance measured by the expected outcomes of the enrollees, but also show that the adaptive randomization scheme is able to compensate poorly specified historical inputs by improving patient outcomes within a reasonable horizon. The simulation results also confirm that the proposed design allows efficient learning of the treatments by alleviating the curse of dimensionality.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 20

  • Comparing adaptive interventions under a general sequential multiple assignment randomized trial design via multiple comparisons with the best, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 10.1016/j.jspi.2020.06.008, 211, (143-153), (2021).
  • Smart Learning Using Big and Small Data for Mobile and IOT e-Health, Intelligent Internet of Things, 10.1007/978-3-030-30367-9, (607-636), (2020).
  • Personalized Policy Learning Using Longitudinal Mobile Health Data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 10.1080/01621459.2020.1785476, (1-11), (2020).
  • Making public and patient involvement in clinical trials more than aspirational, Neurology: Clinical Practice, 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000786, 10, 3, (188-189), (2019).
  • undefined, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge - LAK19, 10.1145/3303772.3303812, (539-548), (2019).
  • A gate-keeping test for selecting adaptive interventions under general designs of sequential multiple assignment randomized trials, Contemporary Clinical Trials, 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105830, 85, (105830), (2019).
  • Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs in Implementation Research, Psychiatry Research, 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.027, (2019).
  • Developing Behavior Change Interventions for Self-Management in Chronic Illness, European Psychologist, 10.1027/1016-9040/a000330, 24, 1, (7-25), (2019).
  • An interpretable health behavioral intervention policy for mobile device users, IBM Journal of Research and Development, 10.1147/JRD.2017.2769320, 62, 1, (4:1-4:6), (2018).
  • Evaluation of a recommender app for apps for the treatment of depression and anxiety: an analysis of longitudinal user engagement, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 10.1093/jamia/ocy023, 25, 8, (955-962), (2018).
  • Optimal treatment allocations in space and time for on‐line control of an emerging infectious disease, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 10.1111/rssc.12266, 67, 4, (743-789), (2018).
  • Are Nomothetic or Ideographic Approaches Superior in Predicting Daily Exercise Behaviors?, Methods of Information in Medicine, 10.3414/ME16-02-0051, 56, 06, (452-460), (2018).
  • Dynamic modelling of n-of-1 data: powerful and flexible data analytics applied to individualised studies, Health Psychology Review, 10.1080/17437199.2017.1343680, 11, 3, (222-234), (2017).
  • An Overview of Research and Evaluation Designs for Dissemination and Implementation, Annual Review of Public Health, 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215, 38, 1, (1-22), (2017).
  • Multilevel Interventions Targeting Obesity: Research Recommendations for Vulnerable Populations, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.09.011, 52, 1, (115-124), (2017).
  • Envisioning a future for precision health psychology: innovative applied statistical approaches to N-of-1 studies, Health Psychology Review, 10.1080/17437199.2017.1347514, 11, 3, (292-294), (2017).
  • Sequential multiple assignment randomization trials with enrichment design, Biometrics, 10.1111/biom.12576, 73, 2, (378-390), (2016).
  • SMART Thinking: a Review of Recent Developments in Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials, Current Epidemiology Reports, 10.1007/s40471-016-0079-3, 3, 3, (225-232), (2016).
  • A decision-theoretic phase I–II design for ordinal outcomes in two cycles, Biostatistics, 10.1093/biostatistics/kxv045, 17, 2, (304-319), (2016).
  • A Review of Dose Finding Methods and Theory, Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods, 10.5351/CSAM.2015.22.5.401, 22, 5, (401-413), (2015).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.