Volume 72, Issue 2
BIOMETRIC METHODOLOGY

A flexible AFT model for misclassified clustered interval‐censored data

María José García‐Zattera

Corresponding Author

Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Casilla 306, Correo 22, Santiago, Chile.

email: mjgarcia@uc.cl

email: atjara@uc.cl

email: komarek@karlin.mff.cuni.cz

Search for more papers by this author
Alejandro Jara

Corresponding Author

Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Casilla 306, Correo 22, Santiago, Chile.

email: mjgarcia@uc.cl

email: atjara@uc.cl

email: komarek@karlin.mff.cuni.cz

Search for more papers by this author
Arnošt Komárek

Corresponding Author

Department of Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University in Prague, Sokolovska 83, CZ‐186 75 Praha 8 ’ Karlín, Czech Republic.

email: mjgarcia@uc.cl

email: atjara@uc.cl

email: komarek@karlin.mff.cuni.cz

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 October 2015
Citations: 6

Summary

Motivated by a longitudinal oral health study, we propose a flexible modeling approach for clustered time‐to‐event data, when the response of interest can only be determined to lie in an interval obtained from a sequence of examination times (interval‐censored data) and on top of that, the determination of the occurrence of the event is subject to misclassification. The clustered time‐to‐event data are modeled using an accelerated failure time model with random effects and by assuming a penalized Gaussian mixture model for the random effects terms to avoid restrictive distributional assumptions concerning the event times. A general misclassification model is discussed in detail, considering the possibility that different examiners were involved in the assessment of the occurrence of the events for a given subject across time. A Bayesian implementation of the proposed model is described in a detailed manner. We additionally provide empirical evidence showing that the model can be used to estimate the underlying time‐to‐event distribution and the misclassification parameters without any external information about the latter parameters. We also provide results of a simulation study to evaluate the effect of neglecting the presence of misclassification in the analysis of clustered time‐to‐event data.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 6

  • Regression analysis of misclassified current status data, Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, 10.1080/10485252.2019.1687892, (1-19), (2019).
  • A validation sampling approach for consistent estimation of adverse drug reaction risk with misclassified right‐censored survival data, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7854, 37, 27, (3887-3903), (2018).
  • Nonparametric double additive cure survival models: An application to the estimation of the non-linear effect of age at first parenthood on fertility progression, Statistical Modelling, 10.1177/1471082X18784685, (1471082X1878468), (2018).
  • Repeated responses in misclassification binary regression: A Bayesian approach, Statistical Modelling, 10.1177/1471082X18773394, (1471082X1877339), (2018).
  • Marginal Bayesian Semiparametric Modeling of Mismeasured Multivariate Interval-Censored Data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 10.1080/01621459.2018.1476240, (17-17), (2018).
  • Survival trees for interval‐censored survival data, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7450, 36, 30, (4831-4842), (2017).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.