Volume 74, Issue 1
BIOMETRIC PRACTICE

A note on marginalization of regression parameters from mixed models of binary outcomes

Donald Hedeker

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: hedeker@uchicago.edu

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Room W254, MC2000, Chicago, Illinois 60637, U.S.A.

email: hedeker@uchicago.eduSearch for more papers by this author
Stephen H. C. du Toit

Scientific Software International, Inc., Skokie, Illinois 60076, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Hakan Demirtas

School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60612, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Robert D. Gibbons

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Room W254, MC2000, Chicago, Illinois 60637, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 April 2017
Citations: 12

Summary

This article discusses marginalization of the regression parameters in mixed models for correlated binary outcomes. As is well known, the regression parameters in such models have the “subject‐specific” (SS) or conditional interpretation, in contrast to the “population‐averaged” (PA) or marginal estimates that represent the unconditional covariate effects. We describe an approach using numerical quadrature to obtain PA estimates from their SS counterparts in models with multiple random effects. Standard errors for the PA estimates are derived using the delta method. We illustrate our proposed method using data from a smoking cessation study in which a binary outcome (smoking, Y/N) was measured longitudinally. We compare our estimates to those obtained using GEE and marginalized multilevel models, and present results from a simulation study.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 12

  • Risks of venous thrombosis and bleeding in critically ill adolescents after trauma or major surgery, Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.06.037, (2020).
  • Assessing the effectiveness of a national protected area network for carnivore conservation, Nature Communications, 10.1038/s41467-020-16792-7, 11, 1, (2020).
  • Multicenter study on the diagnostic performance of multiframe volumetric laser endomicroscopy targets for Barrett’s esophagus neoplasia with histopathology correlation, Diseases of the Esophagus, 10.1093/dote/doaa062, (2020).
  • Ecological momentary assessment of temptations and lapses in non-daily smokers, Psychopharmacology, 10.1007/s00213-020-05539-3, (2020).
  • What characterizes the reminiscence bump in autobiographical memory? New answers to an old question, Memory & Cognition, 10.3758/s13421-019-00994-6, (2020).
  • An Exploratory Randomized Trial of Physical Therapy for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy, Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 10.1177/1545968319899918, (154596831989991), (2020).
  • Unit-Lindley mixed-effect model for proportion data, Journal of Applied Statistics, 10.1080/02664763.2020.1823946, (1-17), (2020).
  • OUP accepted manuscript, Biostatistics, 10.1093/biostatistics/kxz005, (2019).
  • Quantitative Sensory Profiles of Upper Extremity Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Are there differences in sensory profiles for neuropathic versus nociceptive pain?, Canadian Journal of Pain, 10.1080/24740527.2019.1665992, (2019).
  • A population‐averaged approach to diagnostic test meta‐analysis, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.201700187, 61, 1, (126-137), (2018).
  • Leveling up the analysis of the reminiscence bump in autobiographical memory: A new approach based on multilevel multinomial models, Memory & Cognition, 10.3758/s13421-018-0830-8, 46, 7, (1178-1193), (2018).
  • A marginal estimate for the overall treatment effect on a survival outcome within the joint modeling framework, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8713, 0, 0, (undefined).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.