Volume 50, Issue 1
Special Issue Article

The New Development Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: China's Ambiguous Approach to Global Financial Governance

First published: 13 January 2019
Citations: 16

I am grateful to the organizers of the workshop on ‘Beyond Bretton Woods: Complementarity and Competition in the International Economic Order’ at Boston University, where an earlier version of this article was presented, especially Kevin Gallagher and William Kring II. I thank the other participants in the workshop, especially Eric Helleiner, Chris Humphrey and Rebecca Ray, for their input. Special thanks go to Natalie Lichtenstein for her very helpful comments and suggestions; I am grateful also to the anonymous referees for their feedback. All errors remain mine alone.

ABSTRACT

The creation of the New Development Bank (NDB) and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) has generated a great deal of attention and controversy in the development community and beyond. Do these banks indicate that China is promoting a new model of multilateral development finance that undermines the existing system dating back to Bretton Woods? What are the forces shaping China's policy choices in this area? In contrast to the prevailing tendency to view these banks as part and parcel of the same challenge or opportunity for multilateral development financing, this article highlights major distinctions between the NDB and the AIIB. The fact that China is playing a prominent role in both the NDB and the AIIB suggests that China is not promoting a coherent new model of multilateral development financing, but is instead straddling different traditions in this realm of global financial governance. The ambiguity in China's approach to multilateral development finance is shaped by its multiple identities and complex economic and political interests.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 16

  • Development Cooperation in the Context of Contested Global Governance, The Palgrave Handbook of Development Cooperation for Achieving the 2030 Agenda, 10.1007/978-3-030-57938-8, (1-21), (2021).
  • Conclusion, The Political Economy of China–Latin America Relations, 10.1007/978-3-030-33451-2, (91-114), (2020).
  • Latin America: Both Agent and Patient, The Political Economy of China–Latin America Relations, 10.1007/978-3-030-33451-2, (51-67), (2020).
  • China's Role in Global Development Finance: China Challenge or Business as Usual?, Global Policy, 10.1111/1758-5899.12802, 11, 3, (326-335), (2020).
  • ASIAN INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT BANK: ROLE AND TRENDS OF INFLUENCE ON THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL SYSTEM, Economy of Ukraine, 10.15407/economyukr.2020.07.088, 2020, 7, (88-107), (2020).
  • Rising Illusion and Illusion of Rising: Mapping Global Financial Governance and Relocating China, International Studies Review, 10.1093/isr/viaa002, (2020).
  • From Yekaterinburg to Brasilia: BRICS and the G20, road to nowhere?, Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 10.1590/0034-7329202000109, 63, 1, (2020).
  • Intellectual Structure of the Belt and Road Initiative Research: A Scientometric Analysis and Suggestions for a Future Research Agenda, Sustainability, 10.3390/su12176901, 12, 17, (6901), (2020).
  • The construction of “post-hegemonic multipolarity” in Eurasia: A comparative perspective, The Japanese Political Economy, 10.1080/2329194X.2020.1839911, (1-25), (2020).
  • China, India and the pattern of G20/BRICS engagement: differentiated ambivalence between ‘rising’ power status and solidarity with the Global South, Third World Quarterly, 10.1080/01436597.2020.1829464, (1-18), (2020).
  • Global development governance in the ‘interregnum’, Review of International Political Economy, 10.1080/09692290.2020.1852948, (1-27), (2020).
  • The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank – New Multilateralism: Early Development, Innovation, and Future Agendas, Global Policy, 10.1111/1758-5899.12767, 10, 4, (569-581), (2019).
  • Constructive Engagement? The US and the AIIB, Global Policy, 10.1111/1758-5899.12764, 10, 4, (667-676), (2019).
  • China in a World of Orders: Rethinking Compliance and Challenge in Beijing's International Relations, International Security, 10.1162/isec_a_00360, 44, 2, (9-60), (2019).
  • China, the BRICS, and the limitations of reshaping global economic governance, The Pacific Review, 10.1080/09512748.2019.1649298, (1-27), (2019).
  • China, the international criminal court, and global governance, Australian Journal of International Affairs, 10.1080/10357718.2019.1651821, (1-24), (2019).

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.