Policy Intensions and the Folds of the Self
Abstract
In this essay, P. Taylor Webb and Kalervo N. Gulson argue that educational policy is a spatial process and that implementation processes in particular produce crucial emergent geographies for policy research. Webb and Gulson describe how emergent geographies are produced when policy folds actors through senses and enactments of policy. The idea that policy is sensed and enacted is developed into the concept of a policy intension that extends approaches to spatial and, in particular, micropolitical analyses in policy research. Webb and Gulson conclude by discussing cartographical methods that better map the geographies of subjectivity produced through policy intensions.
Number of times cited: 8
- Sophia Rodriguez, They Called us the Revolutionaries, Deterritorializing/Reterritorializing, 10.1007/978-94-6300-977-5_6, (79-97), (2017).
- Aneta Hayes and Sally Findlow, The role of time in policymaking: a Bahraini model of higher education competition, Critical Studies in Education, (1), (2017).
- Stephen Carney, Global Education Policy and the Postmodern Challenge, The Handbook of Global Education Policy, (504-518), (2016).
- Kalervo N. Gulson, The Spatialities of Education Policy Analysis: Globalisation, Scale and Mobility, Super Dimensions in Globalisation and Education, 10.1007/978-981-10-0312-7_10, (161-172), (2016).
- Laura Elizabeth Pinto, Tensions and fissures: the politics of standardised testing and accountability in Ontario, 1995–2015, The Curriculum Journal, 27, 1, (95), (2016).
- Laura Elizabeth Pinto, Fear and loathing in neoliberalism: school leader responses to policy layers, Journal of Educational Administration and History, 47, 2, (140), (2015).
- Shivali Tukdeo, Class divided: Global pressures, domestic pulls and a fractured education policy in India, Policy Futures in Education, 13, 2, (205), (2015).
- Seán Anthony Bracken, From National Policies and Sentiments to Local Practices and Subjectivities, SAGE Open, 4, 1, (215824401452542), (2014).




