ORIGINAL ARTICLE
The Open Courseware Movement in Higher Education: Unmasking Power and Raising Questions about the Movement's Democratic Potential
Abstract
In this essay Robert Rhoads, Jennifer Berdan, and Brit Toven‐Lindsey examine some of the key literature related to the open courseware (OCW) movement (including the emergence and expansion of massive open online courses, or MOOCs), focusing particular attention on the movement's democratic potential. The discussion is organized around three central problems, all relating in some manner or form to issues of power: the problem of epistemology, the problem of pedagogy, and the problem of hegemony. More specifically, the authors raise issues related to the narrow notion of knowledge typically conveyed in the OCW movement, a limited understanding of what constitutes empowering pedagogy, and the lack of treatment of inequities associated with the production of courseware materials. The authors go on to argue that the lack of critical analysis of the OCW movement is tied to its relative alignment with educational reforms driven by neoliberal ideology and that such alignment serves to limit the movement's democratic possibilities.
Citing Literature
Number of times cited: 23
- Germania Rodríguez, Jennifer Pérez, Samanta Cueva and Rommel Torres, A framework for improving web accessibility and usability of Open Course Ware sites, Computers & Education, 109, (197), (2017). the 11th European Conference ECSA '17 Canterbury, United Kingdom Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Software Architecture Companion Proceedings - ECSA '17 Software Architecture ACM Press New York, New York, USA , (2017). 9781450352178 , 10.1145/3129790 20170908091241 http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3129790 Germania Rodriguez Morales and Jennifer Pérez Benedí Towards a reference software architecture for improving the accessibility and usability of open course ware , (2017). 35 38 , 10.1145/3129790.3129796 20170908091241 http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3129790.3129796
- Stephen J.H. Yang, Jeff C.H. Huang and Anna Y.Q. Huang, MOOCs in Taiwan: The Movement and Experiences, Open Education: from OERs to MOOCs, 10.1007/978-3-662-52925-6_5, (101-116), (2016).
- Esra Açıkgül Fırat and Mustafa Serdar Köksal, The relationship between use of Web 2.0 tools by prospective science teachers and their biotechnology literacy, Computers in Human Behavior, 70, (44), (2017).
- Matthew Overstreet, Principled/Digital, Handbook of Research on Writing and Composing in the Age of MOOCs, 10.4018/978-1-5225-1718-4.ch005, (75-86)
- Chris R. Glass, Mitsue S. Shiokawa‐Baklan and Andrew J. Saltarelli, Who Takes MOOCs?, New Directions for Institutional Research, 2015, 167, (41-55), (2016).
- Colin Milligan and Allison Littlejohn, How health professionals regulate their learning in massive open online courses, The Internet and Higher Education, 31, (113), (2016).
- Shantimora Gala Nikolaeva and Dan Nathtan-Roberts, Various Aspects of the Human Factor in Online Education, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 60, 1, (1279), (2016).
- Valerie Swigart and Zhan Liang, Digital resources for nursing education: Open courseware and massive open online courses, International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 3, 3, (307), (2016).
- Xiaomeng Li, Qinghua Chen, Fukang Fang and Jiang Zhang, Is online education more like the global public goods?, Futures, 81, (176), (2016).
- Yu-Ling Lin, Hong-Wen Lin and Tzu-Ting Hung, Value hierarchy for Massive Open Online Courses, Computers in Human Behavior, 53, (408), (2015).
- Francisco ESTEBAN and Juan Luis FUENTES, La educación universitaria virtual: una reflexión en torno al cultivo de las virtudes, Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 27, 1, (103), (2015).
- José Luis Santos, Kenneth R. Roth, Adrian H. Huerta and Zachary S. Ritter, Tech-Centric Classrooms: A Discussion of Policy, Costs, and Access, Mitigating Inequality: Higher Education Research, Policy, and Practice in an Era of Massification and Stratification, 10.1108/S1479-358X20150000011013, (209-241), (2015).
- Brit Toven-Lindsey, Robert A. Rhoads and Jennifer Berdan Lozano, Virtually unlimited classrooms: Pedagogical practices in massive open online courses, The Internet and Higher Education, 24, (1), (2015).
- Ahmed Mohamed Fahmy Yousef, Mohamed Amine Chatti, Ulrik Schroeder, Marold Wosnitza and Harald Jakobs, The State of MOOCs from 2008 to 2014: A Critical Analysis and Future Visions, Computer Supported Education, 10.1007/978-3-319-25768-6_20, (305-327), (2015).
- Neus Lorenzo and Ray Gallon, Higher Education and Globalization, New Voices in Higher Education Research and Scholarship, 10.4018/978-1-4666-7244-4.ch007, (127-156)
- Ståle Angen Rye, The educational space of global online higher education, Geoforum, 51, (6), (2014).
- June Ahn, Anthony Pellicone and Brian S. Butler, Open badges for education: what are the implications at the intersection of open systems and badging?, Research in Learning Technology, 22, (2014).
- Yunkeum Chang, An Analysis of the Growth, Education and Academic Research Trends of iSchools, Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 48, 1, (369), (2014).
- Maureen Ebben and Julien S. Murphy, Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: a review of nascent MOOC scholarship, Learning, Media and Technology, 39, 3, (328), (2014).
- Robert A. Rhoads, Shuai Li and Lauren Ilano, The Global Quest to Build World-Class Universities: Toward a Social Justice Agenda, New Directions for Higher Education, 2014, 168, (27), (2014).
- Douglas McConatha, An ROI Ed-Biz Approach for Deploying Mobile Pedagogy, Mobile Pedagogy and Perspectives on Teaching and Learning, 10.4018/978-1-4666-4333-8.ch015, (250-267)
- Elif Cimsir, MOOCs: an overview of the implications for counsellor education, British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 10.1080/03069885.2018.1536254, (1-13), (2018).
