Evaluations and the Forgetfulness of Pedagogical Relations: Remarks on Educational Authority
Abstract
In this essay, Christiane Thompson addresses the question of evaluative practices, particularly student evaluation of teaching (SET), and their effects with respect to pedagogical relations in the university setting. In the first part of the essay, Thompson draws on Michel Foucault's analysis of power to show how university teaching has come to be defined according to notions of obligation, accountability, and assurance. The forgetfulness of pedagogical relations that results from the increasing use of SET prompts Thompson to rethink the significance of pedagogical relations in the second part of the essay. Referring to the notion of “educational authority” and Foucault's framework of power, Thompson argues that education is about the continuous re‐institution of pedagogical relation to the other. In the final section, Thompson reflects upon the professor's “authority” in terms of constituting a “community of inquiry”: specifically, the seminar is interpreted as a pedagogical setting that implies a different “being‐with” than SET suggests. She concludes by considering what possibilities and limitations the seminar setting offers and how we can discuss this issue (by means of evaluative practice).
Number of times cited: 3
- Päivi Atjonen, “Your career will be over”—Power and contradictions in the work of educational evaluators, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 45, (37), (2015).
- , References, Philosophical Perspectives on Teacher Education, (167-183), (2015).
- Morwenna Griffiths, Encouraging Imagination and Creativity in the Teaching Profession, European Educational Research Journal, 13, 1, (117), (2014).




