The Fundamental Ontology of Study
Abstract
In an effort to disrupt the hegemonic dominance of learning theory, in this article Tyson Lewis explores the unique educational logic of studying. Drawing on the work of Giorgio Agamben, we can understand the operation of study as one of suspension through three modes: preferring not; no longer, not yet; and as not. But the relationship between the operation of suspension and the everyday mode of learning remains an open question requiring further analysis. In order to accomplish this task, it is important to remember that for Agamben, study is a kind of profanation or improper life. Through examining Heidegger's analytic of Dasein's everyday being, Lewis demonstrates that the nature of study is always already saturated with the everyday, and is itself a contaminated process that is neither simply everyday living nor “authentic” existence. To be absolutely precise, the studier engages in idle talk, is curious, and is caught up in ambiguity in order to explore the seemingly uninhabitable zone that rests between everyday falling and authentically standing. Lewis concludes by offering Agamben's own work as a paradigm of study, illustrating how the smallest of freedoms opens to the studier: the freedom to dwell in potentiality.
Number of times cited: 7
- Vasco d’Agnese, ‘Not-being-at-home’: Subject, Freedom and Transcending in Heideggerian Educational Philosophy, Studies in Philosophy and Education, (2018).
- TYSON E. LEWIS, Study Time: Heidegger and the Temporality of Education, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51, 1, (230-247), (2016).
- Derek R. Ford, Studying like a communist: Affect, the Party, and the educational limits to capitalism, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49, 5, (452), (2017).
- Vasco d’Agnese, Chasing Heideggerian circles: Freedom, call, and our educational ground, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49, 10, (946), (2017).
- Vasco d’Agnese, The Eclipse of Imagination Within Educational ‘Official’ Framework and Why It Should be Returned to Educational Discourse: A Deweyan Perspective, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36, 4, (443), (2017).
- Vasco d’Agnese, Behind and Beyond Self-Mastery: Risk, Vulnerability, and Becoming Through Dewey and Heidegger, Interchange, 48, 1, (97), (2017).
- Vasco d’Agnese, Facing paradox everyday: a Heideggerian approach to the ethics of teaching, Ethics and Education, 11, 2, (159), (2016).
