The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Philosophical Reflections on Editing

Nicholas C. Burbules

Department of Education Policy, Organization, and Leadership, University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 July 2014
Cited by: 4

Abstract

In this essay Nicholas C. Burbules reviews his experiences and the lessons he learned as editor of Educational Theory for more than twenty years, and he explores some of the normative choices that are inevitably made by any editor in carrying out his or her role. Burbules examines the relationship of a journal to its intellectual field; the review process; communications and interactions with authors; the process of editing and revising manuscripts; questions of representativeness in a theoretically pluralistic field; the business of journal publishing; and the dilemmas that confront an editor in terms of his or her own position and identity within a field. In all of these reflections, he examines the ethical and political background of the choices made, and how these in turn reveal deeper assumptions about the nature and purpose of academic publishing. The result is to “lift up the curtain” and reveal how one philosophically reflective and self‐questioning editor handled his responsibilities.

Number of times cited: 4

  • , The Long Arc of Knowledge: An interview with Nicholas Burbules, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49, 2, (180), (2017).
  • , Insights from an Editor’s Journey: An interview with Gert Biesta, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49, 2, (141), (2017).
  • , Emerging Perspectives on Editorial Ethics: An interview with Chris Higgins, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49, 2, (169), (2017).
  • , Lifting the Publishing Curtain: The editor interview project of the EPAT Editorial Development Group (EDG), Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49, 2, (105), (2017).