Volume 18, Issue 3 pp. 607-618
GHOTI

Assessing the inclusion of seafood in the sustainable diet literature

Anna K Farmery

Corresponding Author

Anna K Farmery

Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., Australia

Correspondence

Anna K Farmery, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Caleb Gardner

Caleb Gardner

Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Sarah Jennings

Sarah Jennings

Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Bridget S Green

Bridget S Green

Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Reg A Watson

Reg A Watson

Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 January 2017
Citations: 53

Ghoti papers

Ghoti aims to serve as a forum for stimulating and pertinent ideas. Ghoti publishes succinct commentary and opinion that addresses important areas in fish and fisheries science. Ghoti contributions will be innovative and have a perspective that may lead to fresh and productive insight of concepts, issues and research agendas. All Ghoti contributions will be selected by the editors and peer reviewed.

Etymology of Ghoti

George Bernard Shaw (1856–1950), polymath, playwright, Nobel prize winner, and the most prolific letter writer in history, was an advocate of English spelling reform. He was reportedly fond of pointing out its absurdities by proving that “fish” could be spelt “ghoti.” That is: “gh” as in “rough,”“o” as in “women” and “ti” as in palatial.

Abstract

The literature on sustainable diets is broad in its scope, and application yet is consistently supportive of a move away from animal-based diets towards more plant-based diets. The positioning of seafood within the sustainable diet literature is less clear. A literature review was conducted to examine how the environmental impacts of seafood consumption are assessed and what conclusions are being drawn about the inclusion of seafood in a sustainable diet. Seafood is an essential part of the global food system but is not adequately addressed in most of the sustainable diet literature. Aquaculture, the world's fastest growing food sector, was considered by very few papers. Seafood consumption was commonly presented as a dilemma due to the perceived trade-offs between positive health outcomes from eating seafood and concerns of overfishing. A number of studies included seafood as part of their sustainable diet scenario, or as part of a diet that had lower impacts than current consumption. Most of the indicators used were biophysical, with a strong focus on greenhouse gas emissions, and very few studies addressed biological or ecological impacts. The assessment of seafood was limited in many studies due to relevant data sets not being incorporated into the models used. Where they were used, data sources and methodological choices were often not stated thereby limiting the transparency of many studies. Both farmed and wild-capture production methods need to be integrated into research on the impacts of diets and future food scenarios to better understand and promote the benefits of sustainable diets.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.