What makes fish vulnerable to capture by hooks? A conceptual framework and a review of key determinants
Abstract
Considerable time and money are expended in the pursuit of catching fish with hooks (e.g., handlining, angling, longlining, trolling, drumlining) across the recreational, commercial and subsistence fishing sectors. The fish and other aquatic organisms (e.g., squid) that are captured are not a random sample of the population because external (e.g., turbidity) and underlying internal variables (e.g., morphology) contribute to variation in vulnerability to hooks. Vulnerability is the probability of capture for any given fish in a given location at a given time and mechanistically explains the population‐level catchability coefficient, which is a fundamental and usually time‐varying (i.e., dynamic) variable in fisheries science and stock assessment. The mechanistic drivers of individual vulnerability to capture are thus of interest to fishers by affecting catch rates, but are also of considerable importance to fisheries managers whenever hook‐and‐line‐generated data contribute to stock assessments. In this paper, individual vulnerability to hooks is conceptualized as a dynamic state, in which individual fish switch between vulnerable and invulnerable states as a function of three interdependent key processes: an individual fish's internal state, its encounter with the gear, and the characteristics of the encountered gear. We develop a new conceptual framework of “vulnerability,” summarize the major drivers of fish vulnerability, and conclude that fish vulnerability involves complex processes. To understand vulnerability, a shift to interdisciplinary research and the integration of ecophysiology, fish ecology, fisheries ecology and human movement ecology, facilitated by new technological developments, is required.
Number of times cited: 10
- Jack Hollins, Davide Thambithurai, Barbara Koeck, Amelie Crespel, David M. Bailey, Steven J. Cooke, Jan Lindström, Kevin J. Parsons and Shaun S. Killen, A physiological perspective on fisheries‐induced evolution, Evolutionary Applications, 11, 5, (561-576), (2018).
- Shaheen Syed, Melania Borit and Marco Spruit, Narrow lenses for capturing the complexity of fisheries: A topic analysis of fisheries science from 1990 to 2016, Fish and Fisheries, 19, 4, (643-661), (2018).
- Valerio Sbragaglia, Lorenzo Morroni, Lorenzo Bramanti, Boris Weitzmann, Robert Arlinghaus and Ernesto Azzurro, Spearfishing modulates flight initiation distance of fishes: the effects of protection, individual size, and bearing a speargun, ICES Journal of Marine Science, 10.1093/icesjms/fsy059, 75, 5, (1779-1789), (2018).
- Michael J. Louison, J.A. Stein and C.D. Suski, Metabolic phenotype is not associated with vulnerability to angling in bluegill sunfish ( Lepomis macrochirus ) , Canadian Journal of Zoology, 10.1139/cjz-2017-0363, 96, 11, (1264-1271), (2018).
- Warren Mason Potts, Alexander Claus Winkler, Matthew Cameron Parkinson, Carmen Van Dunem Santos, Warwick Hans Hugo Sauer and Amber-Robyn Childs, Comparing catch rate, conventional tagging, and acoustic telemetry data for understanding the migration patterns of coastal fishes, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 10.1139/cjfas-2017-0428, 75, 12, (2364-2374), (2018).
- Christopher T. Monk and Robert Arlinghaus, Eurasian perch, Perca fluviatilis, spatial behaviour determines vulnerability independent of angler skill in a whole-lake reality mining experiment, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, (1), (2017).
- Thomas Klefoth, Christian Skov, Anna Kuparinen and Robert Arlinghaus, Toward a mechanistic understanding of vulnerability to hook-and-line fishing: Boldness as the basic target of angling-induced selection, Evolutionary Applications, 10.1111/eva.12504, 10, 10, (994-1006), (2017).
- Peter T. Kuriyama, Trevor A. Branch, Allan C. Hicks, John H. Harms and Owen S. Hamel, Investigating three sources of bias in hook-and-line surveys: survey design, gear saturation, and multispecies interactions, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 10.1139/cjfas-2017-0286, (1-16), (2018).
- Mark G. Meekan, Mark I. McCormick, Stephen D. Simpson, Douglas P. Chivers and Maud C. O. Ferrari, Never Off the Hook—How Fishing Subverts Predator-Prey Relationships in Marine Teleosts, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10.3389/fevo.2018.00157, 6, (2018).
- Jörgen I. Johnsson and Joacim Näslund, Studying behavioural variation in salmonids from an ecological perspective: observations questions methodological considerations, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 10.1007/s11160-018-9532-3, (2018).




