The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

Original Article

In‐Class vs. Online Testing in University‐Level Language Courses: A Research Report

First published: 03 December 2015

Bill VanPatten (PhD, The University of Texas at Austin) is Professor of Spanish and Second Language Studies, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

Daniel Trego (MA, Michigan State University) is Educational Technology Specialist, CeLTA & Romance and Classical Studies, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

Walter P. Hopkins (MA, Middlebury College) is Assistant Director of Language Instruction for Spanish at Michigan State University, East Lansing.

Abstract

Against the background of concerns for how paper‐and‐pencil testing fits into contemporary language teaching, this brief research report presents the findings of a first study on the difference in scores between in‐class testing and online testing in a communicative and proficiency‐oriented program. A total of 244 students of third‐semester Spanish at the university level participated. One hundred twenty‐four took tests online, while 120 took tests in class. Results showed no difference between the scores, suggesting that at least for this particular kind of program, in‐class testing can be altered and moved online, freeing up class time for alternative measurements (in this case, curriculum‐specific can‐do statements).