Volume 26, Issue 2 p. 509-522
PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLE

Secondary forest fragments offer important carbon and biodiversity cobenefits

Fabio A. R. Matos,

Corresponding Author

Fabio A. R. Matos

Laboratory of Ecology and Evolution of Plants (LEEP), Botany Graduate Program (PPGBot), Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), Viçosa, Brazil

Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

Departamento de Biologia Geral, Faculdade Zacaria de Góes, Valença, Brazil

Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (CEUNES/DCAB), São Mateus, Brazil

Correspondence

Fabio A. R. Matos, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Faculdade Zacaria de Góes, Valença, Bahia, CEP: 45.400-000, Brazil.

Email: fabiomatos.bio@gmail.com

David P. Edwards, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.

Email: david.edwards@sheffield.ac.uk

João A. A. Meira-Neto, Laboratory of Ecology and Evolution of Plants (LEEP), Botany Graduate Program (PPGBot), Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Email: j.meira@ufv.br

Search for more papers by this author
Luiz F. S. Magnago,

Luiz F. S. Magnago

Centro de Formação em Ciências e Tecnologias Agroflorestais, Universidade Federal do Sul da Bahia, Ilhéus, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Carlos Aquila Chan Miranda,

Carlos Aquila Chan Miranda

Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Luis F. T. de Menezes,

Luis F. T. de Menezes

Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (CEUNES/DCAB), São Mateus, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Markus Gastauer,

Markus Gastauer

Instituto Tecnológico Vale, Belém, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Nathália V. H. Safar,

Nathália V. H. Safar

Núcleo Terrantar, Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), Viçosa, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Carlos E. G. R. Schaefer,

Carlos E. G. R. Schaefer

Núcleo Terrantar, Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), Viçosa, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Mônica P. da Silva,

Mônica P. da Silva

Departamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Baiano, Valença, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Marcelo Simonelli,

Marcelo Simonelli

Instituto Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Felicity A. Edwards,

Felicity A. Edwards

Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Sebastião V. Martins,

Sebastião V. Martins

Department of Forest Engineering, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
João A. A. Meira-Neto,

Corresponding Author

João A. A. Meira-Neto

Laboratory of Ecology and Evolution of Plants (LEEP), Botany Graduate Program (PPGBot), Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), Viçosa, Brazil

Correspondence

Fabio A. R. Matos, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Faculdade Zacaria de Góes, Valença, Bahia, CEP: 45.400-000, Brazil.

Email: fabiomatos.bio@gmail.com

David P. Edwards, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.

Email: david.edwards@sheffield.ac.uk

João A. A. Meira-Neto, Laboratory of Ecology and Evolution of Plants (LEEP), Botany Graduate Program (PPGBot), Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Email: j.meira@ufv.br

Search for more papers by this author
David P. Edwards,

Corresponding Author

David P. Edwards

Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

Correspondence

Fabio A. R. Matos, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Faculdade Zacaria de Góes, Valença, Bahia, CEP: 45.400-000, Brazil.

Email: fabiomatos.bio@gmail.com

David P. Edwards, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK.

Email: david.edwards@sheffield.ac.uk

João A. A. Meira-Neto, Laboratory of Ecology and Evolution of Plants (LEEP), Botany Graduate Program (PPGBot), Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Email: j.meira@ufv.br

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 September 2019
Citations: 35
Fabio A. R. Matos and David P. Edwards contributed equally to this study.

Abstract

Tropical forests store large amounts of carbon and high biodiversity, but are being degraded at alarming rates. The emerging global Forest and Landscape Restoration (FLR) agenda seeks to limit global climate change by removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere through the growth of trees. In doing so, it may also protect biodiversity as a free cobenefit, which is vital given the massive shortfall in funding for biodiversity conservation. We investigated whether natural forest regeneration on abandoned pastureland offers such cobenefits, focusing for the first time on the recovery of taxonomic diversity (TD), phylogenetic diversity (PD) and functional diversity (FD) of trees, including the recovery of threatened and endemic species richness, within isolated secondary forest (SF) fragments. We focused on the globally threatened Brazilian Atlantic Forest, where commitments have been made to restore 1 million hectares under FLR. Three decades after land abandonment, regenerating forests had recovered ~20% (72 Mg/ha) of the above-ground carbon stocks of a primary forest (PF), with cattle pasture containing just 3% of stocks relative to PFs. Over this period, SF recovered ~76% of TD, 84% of PD and 96% of FD found within PFs. In addition, SFs had on average recovered 65% of threatened and ~30% of endemic species richness of primary Atlantic forest. Finally, we find positive relationships between carbon stock and tree diversity recovery. Our results emphasize that SF fragments offer cobenefits under FLR and other carbon-based payments for ecosystem service schemes (e.g. carbon enhancements under REDD+). They also indicate that even isolated patches of SF could help to mitigate climate change and the biodiversity extinction crisis by recovering species of high conservation concern and improving landscape connectivity.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.