Assessing Variability of Complex Descriptive Statistics in Monte Carlo Studies Using Resampling Methods
Summary
Good statistical practice dictates that summaries in Monte Carlo studies should always be accompanied by standard errors. Those standard errors are easy to provide for summaries that are sample means over the replications of the Monte Carlo output: for example, bias estimates, power estimates for tests and mean squared error estimates. But often more complex summaries are of interest: medians (often displayed in boxplots), sample variances, ratios of sample variances and non‐normality measures such as skewness and kurtosis. In principle, standard errors for most of these latter summaries may be derived from the Delta Method, but that extra step is often a barrier for standard errors to be provided. Here, we highlight the simplicity of using the jackknife and bootstrap to compute these standard errors, even when the summaries are somewhat complicated. © 2014 The Authors. International Statistical Review © 2014 International Statistical Institute
Citing Literature
Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 2
- Tim P. Morris, Ian R. White, Michael J. Crowther, Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8086, 38, 11, (2074-2102), (2019).
- Laura D Howe, Andrew D Smith, Corrie Macdonald-Wallis, Emma L Anderson, Bruna Galobardes, Debbie A Lawlor, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Rebecca Hardy, Rachel Cooper, Kate Tilling, Abigail Fraser, Relationship between mediation analysis and the structured life course approach, International Journal of Epidemiology, 10.1093/ije/dyw254, (dyw254), (2016).




