Volume 86, Issue 2
Original Article

Comparing Inference Methods for Non‐probability Samples

Bart Buelens

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: b.buelens@cbs.nl

Statistics Netherlands, P.O. Box 4481, 6401 CZ Heerlen, The Netherlands

Bart Buelens, Statistics Netherlands, P.O. Box 4481, 6401 CZ Heerlen, The Netherlands. E‐mail:

b.buelens@cbs.nl

Search for more papers by this author
Joep Burger

Statistics Netherlands, P.O. Box 4481, 6401 CZ Heerlen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Jan A. van den Brakel

Statistics Netherlands, P.O. Box 4481, 6401 CZ Heerlen, The Netherlands

Maastricht University School of Business and Economics, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 May 2018
Citations: 2

Summary

Social and economic scientists are tempted to use emerging data sources like big data to compile information about finite populations as an alternative for traditional survey samples. These data sources generally cover an unknown part of the population of interest. Simply assuming that analyses made on these data are applicable to larger populations is wrong. The mere volume of data provides no guarantee for valid inference. Tackling this problem with methods originally developed for probability sampling is possible but shown here to be limited. A wider range of model‐based predictive inference methods proposed in the literature are reviewed and evaluated in a simulation study using real‐world data on annual mileages by vehicles. We propose to extend this predictive inference framework with machine learning methods for inference from samples that are generated through mechanisms other than random sampling from a target population. Describing economies and societies using sensor data, internet search data, social media and voluntary opt‐in panels is cost‐effective and timely compared with traditional surveys but requires an extended inference framework as proposed in this article.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.