Volume 60, Issue 3

Dose‐Finding Based on Efficacy–Toxicity Trade‐Offs

First published: 27 August 2004
Citations: 292

Abstract

Summary We present an adaptive Bayesian method for dose‐finding in phase I/II clinical trials based on trade‐offs between the probabilities of treatment efficacy and toxicity. The method accommodates either trinary or bivariate binary outcomes, as well as efficacy probabilities that possibly are nonmonotone in dose. Doses are selected for successive patient cohorts based on a set of efficacy–toxicity trade‐off contours that partition the two‐dimensional outcome probability domain. Priors are established by solving for hyperparameters that optimize the fit of the model to elicited mean outcome probabilities. For trinary outcomes, the new algorithm is compared to the method of Thall and Russell (1998, Biometrics54, 251–264) by application to a trial of rapid treatment for ischemic stroke. The bivariate binary outcome case is illustrated by a trial of graft‐versus‐host disease treatment in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Computer simulations show that, under a wide rage of dose‐outcome scenarios, the new method has high probabilities of making correct decisions and treats most patients at doses with desirable efficacy–toxicity trade‐offs.

Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 292

  • A phase I‐II design based on periodic and continuous monitoring of disease status and the times to toxicity and death, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8528, 39, 15, (2035-2050), (2020).
  • Comparison of Phase I-II designs with parametric or semi-parametric models using two different risk-benefit trade-off criteria, Contemporary Clinical Trials, 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106099, 97, (106099), (2020).
  • A Bayesian seamless phase I–II trial design with two stages for cancer clinical trials with drug combinations, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.201900095, 62, 5, (1300-1314), (2020).
  • Quantitative Translation in Immuno‐Oncology Research and Development, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 10.1002/cpt.1936, 108, 3, (430-433), (2020).
  • Dose Finding for Drug Combinations, Principles and Practice of Clinical Trials, 10.1007/978-3-319-52677-5, (1-29), (2020).
  • Design considerations for phase I/II dose finding clinical trials in Immuno-oncology and cell therapy, Contemporary Clinical Trials, 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106083, 96, (106083), (2020).
  • Biostatistics in Clinical Trials, Quantitative Methods in Pharmaceutical Research and Development, 10.1007/978-3-030-48555-9, (1-70), (2020).
  • Novel Bayesian Adaptive Designs and Their Applications in Cancer Clinical Trials, Computational and Methodological Statistics and Biostatistics, 10.1007/978-3-030-42196-0_17, (395-426), (2020).
  • Group sequential designs for clinical trials with bivariate endpoints, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8696, 39, 26, (3823-3839), (2020).
  • Current status of Bayesian clinical trials for oncology, 2020, Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100658, (100658), (2020).
  • Checkerboard: a Bayesian efficacy and toxicity interval design for phase I/II dose-finding trials, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2020.1815033, (1-20), (2020).
  • A Curve-Free Bayesian Decision-Theoretic Design for Phase Ia/Ib Trials Considering Both Safety and Efficacy Outcomes, Statistics in Biosciences, 10.1007/s12561-020-09272-5, (2020).
  • The Microbiome and the Gut‐Liver‐Brain Axis for Central Nervous System Clinical Pharmacology: Challenges in Specifying and Integrating In Vitro and In Silico Models, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 10.1002/cpt.1870, 0, 0, (2020).
  • A Bayesian adaptive phase I/II clinical trial design with late‐onset competing risk outcomes, Biometrics, 10.1111/biom.13347, 0, 0, (2020).
  • An information theoretic approach for selecting arms in clinical trials, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 10.1111/rssb.12391, 0, 0, (2020).
  • Adaptive trial designs for spinal cord injury clinical trials directed to the central nervous system, Spinal Cord, 10.1038/s41393-020-00547-8, (2020).
  • TEPI-2 and UBI: designs for optimal immuno-oncology and cell therapy dose finding with toxicity and efficacy, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2020.1814802, (1-14), (2020).
  • A dose-finding approach for genomic patterns in phase I trials, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2020.1744619, (1-20), (2020).
  • TITE‐BOIN‐ET: Time‐to‐event Bayesian optimal interval design to accelerate dose‐finding based on both efficacy and toxicity outcomes, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1995, 19, 3, (335-349), (2019).
  • A utility approach to individualized optimal dose selection using biomarkers, Biometrical Journal, 10.1002/bimj.201900030, 62, 2, (386-397), (2019).
  • The Case for an Unblinded Modeler in Early Clinical Development, The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 10.1002/jcph.1526, 60, 3, (369-377), (2019).
  • An adaptive trial design to optimize dose‐schedule regimes with delayed outcomes, Biometrics, 10.1111/biom.13116, 76, 1, (304-315), (2019).
  • Designs for Early-Phase Immunotherapeutic Agent Trials, Dose-Finding Designs for Early-Phase Cancer Clinical Trials, 10.1007/978-4-431-55585-8_6, (121-133), (2019).
  • Designs Considering Toxicity and Efficacy, Dose-Finding Designs for Early-Phase Cancer Clinical Trials, 10.1007/978-4-431-55585-8_5, (95-120), (2019).
  • Bayesian uncertainty‐directed dose finding designs, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 10.1111/rssc.12355, 68, 5, (1393-1410), (2019).
  • Designing and conducting proof-of-concept chronic pain analgesic clinical trials, PAIN Reports, 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000697, 4, 3, (e697), (2019).
  • Reprioritizing Risk and Benefit: The Future of Study Design in Early‐Phase Cancer Research, Ethics & Human Research, 10.1002/eahr.500033, 41, 6, (2-11), (2019).
  • A Phase II Clinical Trial Design for Associated Co-primary Efficacy and Toxicity Outcomes with Baseline Covariates, Bayesian Statistics and New Generations, 10.1007/978-3-030-30611-3_13, (125-133), (2019).
  • 2D (2 Dimensional) TEQR design for Determining the optimal Dose for safety and efficacy, Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100461, 16, (100461), (2019).
  • Ranking the importance of genetic factors by variable‐selection confidence sets, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 10.1111/rssc.12337, 68, 3, (727-749), (2019).
  • Combined criteria for dose optimisation in early phase clinical trials, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8292, 38, 21, (4172-4188), (2019).
  • A utility‐based Bayesian optimal interval (U‐BOIN) phase I/II design to identify the optimal biological dose for targeted and immune therapies, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8361, 38, 28, (S5299-S5316), (2019).
  • Multifunctional magnetic hairbot for untethered osteogenesis, ultrasound contrast imaging and drug delivery, Biomaterials, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119394, (119394), (2019).
  • Discussion of “A hybrid phase I‐II/III clinical trial design allowing dose re‐optimization in phase III” by Andrew G. Chapple and Peter F. Thall, Biometrics, 10.1111/biom.12992, 75, 2, (385-388), (2019).
  • Discussion of “A Hybrid Phase I‐II/III Clinical Trial Design Allowing Dose Re‐Optimization in Phase III” by Andrew G. Chapple and Peter F. Thall, Biometrics, 10.1111/biom.12993, 75, 2, (382-384), (2019).
  • A hybrid phase I‐II/III clinical trial design allowing dose re‐optimization in phase III, Biometrics, 10.1111/biom.12994, 75, 2, (371-381), (2019).
  • Cumulative Toxicity in Targeted Therapies: What to Expect at the Recommended Phase II Dose, JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 10.1093/jnci/djz024, (2019).
  • An adaptive design for the identification of the optimal dose using joint modeling of continuous repeated biomarker measurements and time-to-toxicity in phase I/II clinical trials in oncology, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1177/0962280219837737, (096228021983773), (2019).
  • A latent variable model for improving inference in trials assessing the effect of dose on toxicity and composite efficacy endpoints, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10.1177/0962280219831038, (096228021983103), (2019).
  • Bayesian Methods in Regulatory Science, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 10.1080/19466315.2019.1668843, (1-7), (2019).
  • Generalization of the time-to-event continual reassessment method to bivariate outcomes, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2019.1634087, (1-13), (2019).
  • Rapid enrollment design for finding the optimal dose in immunotherapy trials with ordered groups, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2019.1633654, (1-10), (2019).
  • Sequential or combined designs for Phase I/II clinical trials? A simulation study, Clinical Trials, 10.1177/1740774519872702, (174077451987270), (2019).
  • A Bayesian adaptive design for addressing correlated late-onset outcomes in phase I/II randomized trials of drug combinations in oncology, Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 10.1080/03610918.2019.1704784, (1-15), (2019).
  • The Need for Combined Assessment of Multiple Outcomes in Noninferiority Trials in Oncology, JAMA Oncology, 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.5361, (2019).
  • Optimal design to discriminate between rival copula models for a bivariate binary response, TEST, 10.1007/s11749-018-0595-1, 28, 1, (147-165), (2018).
  • AAA: triple adaptive Bayesian designs for the identification of optimal dose combinations in dual‐agent dose finding trials, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 10.1111/rssc.12291, 68, 2, (385-410), (2018).
  • Treatment and dose prioritization in early phase platform trials of targeted cancer therapies, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 10.1111/rssc.12324, 68, 2, (475-491), (2018).
  • An information theoretic phase I–II design for molecularly targeted agents that does not require an assumption of monotonicity, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 10.1111/rssc.12293, 68, 2, (347-367), (2018).
  • Phase I–II trial design for biologic agents using conditional auto‐regressive models for toxicity and efficacy, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 10.1111/rssc.12314, 68, 2, (331-345), (2018).
  • Dose individualization and variable selection by using the Bayesian lasso in early phase dose finding trials, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 10.1111/rssc.12326, 68, 2, (445-460), (2018).
  • A utility‐based Bayesian phase I–II design for immunotherapy trials with progression‐free survival end point, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 10.1111/rssc.12288, 68, 2, (411-425), (2018).
  • A dose finding design for seizure reduction in neonates, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 10.1111/rssc.12289, 68, 2, (427-444), (2018).
  • Distributed lag interaction models with two pollutants, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 10.1111/rssc.12297, 68, 1, (79-97), (2018).
  • A Bayesian model‐free approach to combination therapy phase I trials using censored time‐to‐toxicity data, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 10.1111/rssc.12323, 68, 2, (309-329), (2018).
  • PairClone: a Bayesian subclone caller based on mutation pairs, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 10.1111/rssc.12328, 68, 3, (705-725), (2018).
  • Dirichlet process mixtures of order statistics with applications to retail analytics, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 10.1111/rssc.12296, 68, 1, (3-28), (2018).
  • Bayesian log‐Gaussian Cox process regression: applications to meta‐analysis of neuroimaging working memory studies, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 10.1111/rssc.12295, 68, 1, (217-234), (2018).
  • Detecting weak dependence in computer network traffic patterns by using higher criticism, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 10.1111/rssc.12325, 68, 3, (641-655), (2018).
  • Bayesian analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data with spatially varying auto‐regressive orders, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 10.1111/rssc.12320, 68, 3, (521-541), (2018).
  • Two‐stage design for phase I–II cancer clinical trials using continuous dose combinations of cytotoxic agents, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 10.1111/rssc.12294, 68, 1, (235-250), (2018).
  • A Bayesian design for phase I cancer therapeutic vaccine trials, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.8021, 38, 7, (1170-1189), (2018).
  • Design and Conduct Considerations for First‐in‐Human Trials, Clinical and Translational Science, 10.1111/cts.12582, 12, 1, (6-19), (2018).
  • Drug development and clinical trial design in pancreatico-biliary malignancies, Current Problems in Cancer, 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.01.003, 42, 1, (73-94), (2018).
  • Extensions of the mTPI and TEQR designs to include non-monotone efficacy in addition to toxicity for optimal dose determination for early phase immunotherapy oncology trials, Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.01.006, 10, (62-76), (2018).
  • Dose Finding for Molecularly Targeted Agents (MTAs), Modern Dose-Finding Designs for Cancer Phase I Trials: Drug Combinations and Molecularly Targeted Agents, 10.1007/978-4-431-55573-5_4, (59-80), (2018).
  • Design of Clinical Trials and Studies, Principles and Practice of Clinical Research, 10.1016/B978-0-12-849905-4.00018-6, (249-268), (2018).
  • Optimizing the Cost-Effectiveness of a Multicomponent Intervention Using Data from a Factorial Experiment: Considerations, Open Questions, and Tradeoffs Among Multiple Outcomes, Optimization of Behavioral, Biobehavioral, and Biomedical Interventions, 10.1007/978-3-319-91776-4_7, (207-267), (2018).
  • A bargaining approach for resolving the tradeoff between beneficial and harmful drug responses, Journal of Mathematical Biology, 10.1007/s00285-018-1242-x, 77, 4, (1059-1072), (2018).
  • Early phase and adaptive design clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of early phase trials, Rheumatology Advances in Practice, 10.1093/rap/rky045, 2, 2, (2018).
  • Dose Finding for Joint Assessment of Both Efficacy and Toxicity, Modern Dose-Finding Designs for Cancer Phase I Trials: Drug Combinations and Molecularly Targeted Agents, 10.1007/978-4-431-55573-5_3, (41-58), (2018).
  • An Adaptive Dose-Finding Design Based on Both Safety and Immunologic Responses in Cancer Clinical Trials, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 10.1080/19466315.2018.1462727, 10, 3, (185-195), (2018).
  • Phase I–II trial designs: how early should efficacy guide the dose recommendation process?, Annals of Oncology, 10.1093/annonc/mdy044, 29, 3, (540-541), (2018).
  • Efficacy/toxicity dose-finding using hierarchical modeling for multiple populations, Contemporary Clinical Trials, 10.1016/j.cct.2018.06.012, 71, (162-172), (2018).
  • Molecular Regulation of Cell Cycle and Cell Cycle-Targeted Therapies in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC), Molecular Determinants of Head and Neck Cancer, 10.1007/978-3-319-78762-6_7, (185-227), (2018).
  • The Evolution of Phase I Trials, Past, Present, and Future, Novel Designs of Early Phase Trials for Cancer Therapeutics, 10.1016/B978-0-12-812512-0.00003-8, (17-32), (2018).
  • Bayesian joint modelling of benefit and risk in drug development, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1852, 17, 3, (248-263), (2018).
  • BOIN‐ET: Bayesian optimal interval design for dose finding based on both efficacy and toxicity outcomes, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1864, 17, 4, (383-395), (2018).
  • SPIRIT: A seamless phase I/II randomized design for immunotherapy trials, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1869, 17, 5, (527-540), (2018).
  • A Bayesian hierarchal modeling approach to shortening phase I/II trials of anticancer drug combinations, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1895, 17, 6, (750-760), (2018).
  • An adaptive multi-stage phase I dose-finding design incorporating continuous efficacy and toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2018.1535497, (1-16), (2018).
  • Improved adaptive randomization strategies for a seamless Phase I/II dose-finding design, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2018.1535496, (1-15), (2018).
  • Phase I–II clinical trial design: a state-of-the-art paradigm for dose finding, Annals of Oncology, 10.1093/annonc/mdx795, 29, 3, (694-699), (2017).
  • Some statistical considerations in the clinical development of cancer immunotherapies, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1835, 17, 1, (49-60), (2017).
  • The Randomized CRM: An Approach to Overcoming the Long-Memory Property of the CRM, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2017.1293076, 27, 6, (1028-1042), (2017).
  • Novel Early Phase Clinical Trial Design in Oncology, Pharmaceutical Medicine, 10.1007/s40290-017-0205-7, 31, 5, (297-307), (2017).
  • Implementing the EffTox dose-finding design in the Matchpoint trial, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10.1186/s12874-017-0381-x, 17, 1, (2017).
  • A Versatile Adaptive Dose-Finding Design Based on Multiple Endpoints, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 10.1080/19466315.2017.1341333, 9, 3, (302-313), (2017).
  • Sequential designs for individualized dosing in phase I cancer clinical trials, Contemporary Clinical Trials, 10.1016/j.cct.2016.08.018, 63, (51-58), (2017).
  • Dose Finding in Late-Phase Drug Development, Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 10.1177/2168479017709297, 51, 6, (738-743), (2017).
  • An Escalation for Bivariate Binary Endpoints Controlling the Risk of Overtoxicity (EBE-CRO): Managing Efficacy and Toxicity in Early Oncology Clinical Trials, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2017.1295248, 27, 6, (1054-1072), (2017).
  • Statistical controversies in clinical research: building the bridge to phase II—efficacy estimation in dose-expansion cohorts, Annals of Oncology, 10.1093/annonc/mdx045, 28, 7, (1427-1435), (2017).
  • Experiences of establishing an academic early phase clinical trials unit, Clinical Trials, 10.1177/1740774517710250, 14, 4, (349-356), (2017).
  • Pharmacokinetically guided optimum adaptive dose selection in early phase clinical trials, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 10.1016/j.csda.2017.02.009, 111, (183-202), (2017).
  • The Case for a Bayesian Approach to Benefit-Risk Assessment:, Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 10.1177/2168479017698190, 51, 5, (568-574), (2017).
  • Inotuzumab ozogamicin in adults with relapsed or refractory CD22-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a phase 1/2 study, Blood Advances, 10.1182/bloodadvances.2016001925, 1, 15, (1167-1180), (2017).
  • Dose-finding designs for trials of molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapies, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1080/10543406.2017.1289952, 27, 3, (477-494), (2017).
  • Bayesian adaptive dose‐escalation designs for simultaneously estimating the optimal and maximum safe dose based on safety and efficacy, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1818, 16, 6, (396-413), (2017).
  • Adaptive phase I/II clinical trials for drug combination assessment in oncology using the outcomes of each cycle, Pharmaceutical Statistics, 10.1002/pst.1822, 16, 6, (433-444), (2017).
  • STEIN: A simple toxicity and efficacy interval design for seamless phase I/II clinical trials, Statistics in Medicine, 10.1002/sim.7428, 36, 26, (4106-4120), (2017).
  • See more

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.