From Virtual Public Spheres to Global Justice: A Critical Theory of Internetworked Social Movements*
The author wishes to note his appreciation to his graduate students, Douglas Morris and Andrew Fraker, who made important contributions to this article.
Abstract
From the early 1990s when the EZLN (the Zapatistas), led by Subcommandte Marcos, first made use of the Internet to the late 1990s with the defeat of the Multilateral Agreement on Trade and Investment and the anti‐WTO protests in Seattle, Quebec, and Genoa, it became evident that new, qualitatively different kinds of social protest movements were emergent. These new movements seemed diffuse and unstructured, yet at the same time, they forged unlikely coalitions of labor, environmentalists, feminists, peace, and global social justice activists collectively critical of the adversities of neoliberal globalization and its associated militarism. Moreover, the rapid emergence and worldwide proliferation of these movements, organized and coordinated through the Internet, raised a number of questions that require rethinking social movement theory. Specifically, the electronic networks that made contemporary globalization possible also led to the emergence of “virtual public spheres” and, in turn, “Internetworked Social Movements.” Social movement theory has typically focused on local structures, leadership, recruitment, political opportunities, and strategies from framing issues to orchestrating protests. While this tradition still offers valuable insights, we need to examine unique aspects of globalization that prompt such mobilizations, as well as their democratic methods of participatory organization and clever use of electronic media. Moreover, their emancipatory interests become obscured by the “objective” methods of social science whose “neutrality” belies a tacit assent to the status quo. It will be argued that the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory offers a multi‐level, multi‐disciplinary approach that considers the role of literacy and media in fostering modernist bourgeois movements as well as anti‐modernist fascist movements. This theoretical tradition offers a contemporary framework in which legitimacy crises are discussed and participants arrive at consensual truth claims; in this process, new forms of empowered, activist identities are fostered and negotiated that impel cyberactivism.
Number of times cited: 8
- Raphael Schlembach, Negation, Refusal and Co‐Optation: The Frankfurt School and Social Movement Theory, Sociology Compass, 9, 11, (987-999), (2015).
- Beth Gharrity Gardner, Social Media, The Wiley‐Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, (2013).
- Lauren Langman, Domination, The Wiley‐Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization, (2012).
- Lauren Langman, Globalization from Below, The Wiley‐Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization, (2012).
- John Michael Roberts, Public Spaces of Dissent, Sociology Compass, 2, 2, (654-674), (2008).
- Frédéric Vandenberghe, Avatars of the Collective: A Realist Theory of Collective Subjectivities*, Sociological Theory, 25, 4, (295-324), (2007).
- Raewyn Connell, The Northern Theory of Globalization*, Sociological Theory, 25, 4, (368-385), (2007).
- Charles Tilly, Trust Networks in Transnational Migration, Sociological Forum, 22, 1, (3-24), (2007).




